Climate change . again .

Somehow these republicans find it easier to live their lives if they simply ignore/deny the real problems in the world and instead focus on imaginary ones. But a lot of time and expense has been spent to persuade these folks to think this way.

It's not odd. Accepting the reality of climate change means acknowledging the need for heavy regulations. Problems that can't be solved by the free market will always be downplayed by the market always knows best-types. That's why many people(especially in the U.S.) won’t accept or take seriously a well-known kind of market failure.

I think the response to any problem is the real issue.

Someone who flies around in a private jet and buys carbon credits to maintain their lifestyle is going to tell a peasant what they need to do?

Plastic straws are banned but the government allows Keurig to sell plastic coffee pods? Uh huh.

It's just another trick to keep people divided.

People know that liberals are psychopaths so they do not care what liberals say about anything. Climate change alarmists are psychopaths and people can tell.

One of the results of climate change alarmism is that people who can feel real emotions will be less likely to have kids. If psychopaths keep having kids and people who can feel real emotions have less kids because of climate change then the future on "humanity" is psychopath. No person who can feel real emotions would go out in public and try to scare people who can feel real emotions out of having kids. Why do liberals want to scare people who can feel real emotions out of having kids.

The core difference of liberals and conservatives is liberals are psychopaths who have no parental instinct and conservatives are a mixture of psychopaths who have parental instinct and people who can feel real emotions. Liberals view parental instinct as a nuisance to their psychopath manipulation of the young. An example is that all liberals want to get kids addicted to drugs but conservatives have parental instinct so they don't want their kids to get addicted to drugs.

In the history of european people, there have always been some psychopaths wanting to scare europeans who can feel real emotions. In medieval europe catholic priests and other psychopath priestly class people wanted to always threaten european people with death. In today's world, liberals are the priestly class who want to always threaten european people who can feel real emotions with death.

Can psychopaths just let people who can feel real emotions live in peace without psychopaths constantly threatening people with death? Can liberals do that?

Nobody should believe in climate change.
You should study it, try to understand it, examine it, challenge it, try to come up with alternate explanations of the data, agree or disagree with it based on reason. But you should never BELIEVE a scientific theory. Belief is for religion.

And that's the problem. People who say they don't believe in climate change usually are not applying reason, they are relying on belief. And people who are republicans are more likely to base their view of things on what they want to believe, not what actually is.

Also, if liberals were serious about climate change they would not want "small carbon footprint" third world people to move into the USA so that they become "large carbon footprint" americans.

Psychopath liberals actually use climate change as justification to move illegal immigrants into the USA because supposedly it is not overpopulation of the third world that makes the third world bad, it is climate change.

"anyone got any other explanations?"

Yes, trying using common sense.

That's because "liberals" are idiots that can be easily brainwashed. The Earth has survived much much more, than anything thats happened in the last 150 years before muh iNdUsTriAL ReVoLuTioN, for billions of years.

Even if everyone in the west does what the alarmists want, they still have absolutely NO WAY to control the rest of the world like China, India, and Russia from polluting the ever loving fuck out of the planet.

The focus should be on adaption.