MovieChat Forums > Politics > The One Thing That Bothers Me About 'Pro...

The One Thing That Bothers Me About 'Progressives'


Even as a staunch/instinctive leftist, there is one facet of progressivism, as a concept, that bothers me, especially in view of my accute mental illnesses (i.e. OCD and Anxiety), which I suspect is as bad if not worse for a lot of people on the Autistic Spectrum, and that's how shallow progressivism is as a concept. By its very nature, it's all about changing/adapting to circumstances, and thus disregarding everything one believed/thought they knew about the world.

Now, there's a lot of positives to such thinking, including sophistication, maturity and adaptability, but the ability to essentially snap from one way of thinking to another is, arguably, very shallow (which perhaps explains why so many 'celebrities' at least *feign* 'progressive' beliefs, since La La Land is not known for its sincerity and depth of feeling). For people whose whole life is defined by material success (i.e. wealth, status, image, popularity, career advancement) it's no doubt very easy to glide from one way of thinking to another (without really believing anything; hence the large number of sex-offending 'feminists' among supposedly 'liberal' celebrities and politicians), but for many of us, *especially* those of us who have neurodivergent conditions or mental illnesses, that makes it very hard for us to deal with cognitive dissonance, it can be extremely hard to repudiate everything we'd been raised/conditioned to believe for years/decades. And that's largely down to depth-of-feeling. If one feels something particularly strongly (i.e. one isn't the type to live by the old Groucho Marx line "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others"), it's much harder to learn to feel *something else* (which also goes to why it's SO important to raise children with the very values, including compassion, charity, non-sexism, non-racism, tolerance etc we hope they'll continue to possess *throughout* life).

This isn't an argument against progressivism per se, but it is an argument as to why progressives should be more understanding and sympathetic to some people who struggle to adapt, and also why it's VITAL that opinion-formers in the media are consistent from the get-go, instead of recklessly believing that it's easy for everyone to change their opinions on a whim.

reply

no

reply

If you find out that things are not the way you thought they were, is it wise to ignore your new knowledge and keep living according to your old ways?

I can understand that some people like yourself may have difficulty adapting to change. But I've if the things that progressives have worked to change is being others to adapt to people like yourself.

Consider that one of the things that progressives have tried to change minds about is acceptance of people with different abilities such as the neurodiverse. When I was in grade school, in the 1960s, kids on the autism spectrum were considered to be stupid or "retarded". They were pushed to the side by schools and bullied by other students.

Progressive pushed to make sure that schools provide resources to teach this children who were different. Other kids are taught to be accepting of others.

So, maybe you should rethink where the problem lies. I think you are a good person to teach others about the difficulties of adapting so that new ways can be found to help.

What do you think?

reply

I'd like Italian dressing on my word salad, please.

________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.

reply

👍
pass the bottle if theres any left ...

reply