Butch lesbians (women who dress and look like men, picture spikey hair) are either confused if they should identify as a man or are getting pissed off with people assuming they're a transman.
Oh I understand perfectly. "Trust the science", except when it comes to basic biology and virology. So basically "trust the science" as long as it coincides with liberal ideology.
Hey Pollack distant relative, I agree with BicKsurN. Can you imagine taking your beautiful young daughter to have a mastectomy because all of a sudden she feels like she’s a male? She’s about 14 now, right? There are so-called parents doing just that!
I could not believe it when I read about these so-called parents agreeing to such a drastic procedure! These “parents” are not parenting. They are so caught up into the woke movement which makes them want to be pals to their kids. The kids are unfortunate to have been born into this type of lifestyle.
One of my favorite memes is a picture of two young boys walking and talking, totin' fishing poles. One says, "did you hear there are now 54 genders?" The other says, "no, there are two genders and 52 new mental illnesses".
Truth.
Everyone wants to talk about mental illness every time there's a mass shooting but no one wants to talk about the most obvious.
Jury is still out on that one. I think all the attempts to normalize it socially, completely ignore the underlying "science". It's not normal and I've always thought there was probably some sort of chemical imbalance behind it.
What underlying "science"? Good that you put "science" is quotes. 🤣
No, the jury is not "out on that one". Homosexuality and bisexuality are not mental illness. Medical professionals do not believe that and it flies in the face of common sense.
And gender identification has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
Flies in the face of common sense??? Homosexuality flies in the face of common sense. If animals exist only to perpetuate their species, how does one gender having sex with itself accomplish that? Nowhere in the animal world is this considered "normal" behavior. It is explicitly abnormal behavior.
"Makeup is not a female thing. It never has been."
Then why do all the alphabet people associate as one big movement???
No shit but gays cannot reproduce at all. What do they have to have to have children? A woman.
No it ain't.
No morality or rightness??? That depends on your beliefs. I don't personally care where you put your dick, as long as it's consensual. You're not just going to sell homosexuality to me as "normal".
Yet they travel on the same bus and march in the same parades.
The sex drive is necessary. Hunger is necessary. Thirst is necessary. But what you fuck, eat and drink is a matter of personal choice.
Christianity says homosexuality is a sin. But science says it's just a variation of human behavior. Science does not show that homosexuals and bisexuals fail at life in general. We are often more successful than the average breeder.
So yeah, we're "normal" as in there is no evidence where we put our dick causes any dysfunction in our general behavior.
Just realize you're falling back on Biblical prohibitions on homosexuality. And that's fine and dandy. But don't tell me there's any rational scientific reason not to have non-reproductive sex.
I do believe in Biblical prohibitions but I also believe in liberty and the Constitution. So I can believe it's morally wrong, while accepting that you have the freedom to stick it where you want.
No, it isn't normal. It is decidedly abnormal. No, there's nothing wrong with non-reproductive sex but homosexuals have no other kind.
"We are often more successful than the average breeder."
I'm sure somewhere there's a study to support that. Do you really think it contributes to polite discourse to label people as "breeder"? Have I used a slur to describe you? No, I have not. But people of your political persuasion love to label and insult people you disagree with. But you accuse us of being bigots?
Dude, you are arguing that reproduction makes heterosexuality superior. How is "breeder" not the perfect term to describe those who believe the only purpose of sex is reproduction? Is that not what you're arguing?
So you admit your bias is religious, based on faith, not science. As I said, that's fine and dandy. But there's no logical basis to say men can only have sex with women.
Bisexuals have sex with both males and females. So is there something wrong with bisexuality, outside of your Christian moralism, in terms of science?
Couples where the wife is past menopause have only non-reproductive sex. Is that "wrong"? What's the point if sex is only for reproduction?
I’m another one who doesn’t believe homosexuality is normal for humans mainly due to anal sex. That also goes for heterosexuals. It’s not healthy to stick a tally whacker into an orifice which expels human waste matter. There is only one purpose for the anus and it’s not for sex. “The anus consists of glands, ducts, blood vessels, mucus, tissues, and nerve endings that can be highly sensitive to pain, irritation, and other sensations.”
Most people don’t want fecal matter on their hands so why would they want it on their penises which is a gateway for infection to their bladders? If they step into a pile of 💩 they say “Gross”, but they think nothing of having it smeared on their private parts. To that I say “Gross!” Also, much damage to the anal area can occur.
Well, my partner douches. And most women who care about their body and appearance douche as well. I've been with women who were not exactly "clean" in their female parts. It goes for every human orifice.
I'm not sure anyone believes vaginal secretions by themself are not a bit gross. But in the context of sex?
I often ask straight people, if the anus is not designed for intercourse, why does my penis fit perfectly up every man's anus I've ever known? And why is the male g-spot, the prostate, up his ass?
These are natural body secretions. Frankly yours sounds like a classic first world problem of detachment from the natural. You get a bit dirty during sex. If you don't, you're doing it wrong.
Sweat, saliva, urine, feces - we are animals.
Yes, I'm a man who has sex with men. Anal sex has been popular throughout history. It's a unique form of intercourse - tighter and hotter, temperature wise. Don't say your bias must be shared by everyone.
And there are homosexuals who do not practice anal sex.
Anal intercourse by itself not a legitimate reason to claim homosexuality is not a valid sexual preference.
”… if the anus is not designed for intercourse, why does my penis fit perfectly up every man's anus…”
I didn’t intend for this to become so graphic, but since you insist…you can make that thing fit anywhere…even a dog’s orifices which some men do! They even fit perfectly in a tub faucet! Of course paramedics had to be called!
” You get a bit dirty during sex. If you don't, you're doing it wrong.”
I may have perspired, but no urine or feces was involved! You sound disgusting!
” Sweat, saliva, urine, feces - we are animals.”
Speak for yourself! Why do people call your types “fudge packers”? I don’t recall the real animal kingdom fornicating with another animal in the nether region. Also, I don’t care how popular it’s been throughout history. You sound promiscuous as most homosexuals are. There is something wrong with people who want to poke inside an “outhouse”! In other words…a 💩 container!
I don't recall another member of the animal kingdom deep kissing as a prelude to intercourse either. We're humans, less driven by reproductive instinct, and more open to experimentation.
You frankly sound like one of those old school Christians who insist the missionary position is the only acceptable one.
The difference between the human anus and a dog's butt or pneumatic tube is that it is a human erogenous zone. It's natural for it to be sexualized.
And if you've performed cunnlingus you've consumed urine. Sorry to be so graphic, but you can't avoid bodily secretions during sex. And kissing a woman and drinking her saliva are very different things. You're objectifying human secretions out of context.
Anal intercourse is as old as humanity itself. We've done it forever.
“You frankly sound like one of those old school Christians who insist the missionary position is the only acceptable one.”
Not at all if you personally knew me. Did you ever stop to think why there are only 2 true genders, male with a penis or female with a vagina? It’s not just for sex, it’s for reproduction. We were given pleasure zones in order to reproduce. You can’t reproduce with anal sex. I don’t give a rat’s patootie how long it’s been done it’s wrong. The human body was not meant for anal/colon copulation. You’re going to be up the 💩 creek if you ever are ever afflicted with IBS, Crohn’s, C-diff or the many other GI maladies.
Think about this. If all homosexuals, both sodomites and lesbians were gathered up and placed on different islands, all of you would die out. You could butt screw to your heart’s content, but you couldn’t reproduce.
And yet "sodomites" and lesbians have been here since the dawn of time and the human race has not died out. Perhaps it's an evolutionary break on overpopulation. Who knows? But it's quite natural when it's between two consenting people so mind your own business.
Gay males who have anal intercourse are not playing with feces. And neither are heterosexual couples who do it as well. This is not a gay issue.
Disease spreads through all body fluids. You focus on one because you don't like gay people. No one has time for your peccadillo. We're too busy just living our lives.
One would think they’d all identify as white men so they could take advantage of all the free ride to wealth the racist patriarchy wealth gap society has to offer.