the lefts very strange relationship with conspiracy theores.. - Politics Discussion

[–] Keelai (34858) 5 years ago

Talk about a pot calling the kettle black.

reply

[–] chilone (17864) 5 years ago

Typical sidestep.

reply

[–] LemmyLugosi (411) 5 years ago

And your response is another one.

reply

[–] chilone (17864) 5 years ago

Not even close.

reply

[–] christomacin (4655) 5 years ago

Most liberal conspiracy theories just can't go the distance because, in the end, you usually have to go with Lucifer controlling everything to make it all work.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Yeah, remember when Democrats pushed the pizzagate conspiracy on Hillary Clinton?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

hillary used a private server, when her emails were hacked it came out that she had been swapping emails using the word "pizza" as a code, based on books from the 70s and pedophiles speaking on it, it became clear that pizza was a pedophile term for children.

fast-forward 3 or 4 years, a man who had bill clinton on his island "at least 6 times" on his private jet and was a donar to the democrat party is arrested for sex trafficking kids, and he dies in his cell, his suicide proof cell, just as the guards go off juty and the camaras stop working. and the LEFT-WING media, not the right! but the LEFT! says we can't question "baseless conspiracy theories"

and if you're too stupid to see the link, either you're biased or retarded, or my worst fear that you're maybe a pedophile.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

*yawn*

I think you will find a more gullible audience for this conspiracy crap over at Daily Stormer. Good luck!

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

any "russian reptiilan shapeshifting robots hacked my brain making me vote for the orange man" conspiracies over there at the daily stormer? i just love those!

reply

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

"hillary used a private server, when her emails were hacked it came out that she had been swapping emails using the word "pizza" as a code, based on books from the 70s and pedophiles speaking on it, it became clear that pizza was a pedophile term for children."

Complete BS. Again... Hillary's private server has nothing to do with the hacked emails from the DNC server. They are completely separate servers. The DNC server hack primarily hacked Podesta emails. Reddit and 4chan concocted the story that in Podesta's emails the words "pizza" and "cheese" were pedophile terms. In reality, those words were referencing Alefantis' Ping Pong Pizzeria. Then Reddit and 4chan went further and called the Pizzeria the main HQ for pedophilia. Yet not one person claimed to be a victim. And not one person had claimed to be a witness. When a conspiracy begins with no witness and no victim, thats how you know its fake.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

the words in the emails were used in such a way you know they are code for something, one says "the pizza will be ready for next month" it doesn't take a month to bake a pizza. so we know they are codes. i've never used reddit nor 4chan, i'm not a 12 year old child.

I did however watch a channel 4 documentary from the UK about jimmy saville, the pedophile that goes deep into british society, in social services, soccer teams, hospitals, charity... i've read other things, and yep "pizza" in all it's forms is a code word used to talk about children.

so fast-forward 3 years, a man who had known links to very same clintons whos emails were hacked is arrested for sex-trafficking childen, bill clinton went to his island "at least 6 times" even when he was president, without the secret service, then he dies in a suicide proof cell when the camaras stopped and the guards just happened to take a break...

if political bias means you don't want to join these very very obvious dots in the name of politics, and for me its not even about trump or clinton, left or right, democrat or republican, it's about truth. then theres a huge problem in this country, theres a huge amount of people who are complict in peodphila, just based on political bias....

reply

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

If you're really concerned about truth you wouldn't have conveniently forgotten to mention Trump whose history of partying with Epstein in the 90s was carefully choreographed by New York tabloid media at the time. Lots of pictures of them together from that period including a party at Mar-a-Lago with just Trump, Esptein, and 28 girls he had flown in back in 1992.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/party-planners-surprise-just-donald-trump-jeff-epstein-and-28-calendar-girls-2019-07-10

Add to that the ultimate responsibility of Epstein's safety in federal prison is Trump's attorney general William Barr who has zero interest in protecting Bill Clinton and every interest in protecting his boss and it surely looks like you're the one infested with political bias for ignoring the obvious and refusing to connect the dots.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

logic isn't your strong point is it? Trump was attacked by the LEFT for retiwitting a conspiracy theory about epsteins "suicide" not being a suicide. the left have called any mention of this as "baseless foilgat nutjob conspiracy theories"

the left wants to wash all this away and put it to bed

Trump is pushing a narrative that says he didn't kill himself

hahahahahaha get it? trump wants it investigated, why want something you played a a part of investigated? and why want something to go away like the left does? yet again, another "liberal" whos complict in pedophilia just because he wants some food stamps

i'd love to be the nigerian prince that sends you a "winning lottery" email. what a fucking imbecil

reply

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

"why want something you played a a part of investigated?"

It's called a 'cover-up' genius. You're one of those sheep who gets easily fleeced. That's why you take everything Trump says at face value, you're gullible. He distracts you by pointing the finger at Clinton to take attention off himself and you believe him.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Anderson Cooper used his "show" to try and destroy a university professor that simply said in a post about sandy hook on his private facebook account "maybe we should look at this a little differently"

I assume you're referring to James Tracy. He was a Florida Atlantic University Professor who publicly called Sandy Hook a hoax and suggested they used crisis actors. If your sympathies lie with James Tracy and not the families of the children murdered at Sandy Hook in a massacre that was very real, than you should question your moral compass. If you're simply trolling and have no problem using a massacre the level of Sandy Hook to do so, your moral compass is also sadly lacking.

Also, I've been enjoying Stephen Colbert's show quite a bit lately...it's as if your prediction that he was going to be arrested a month ago was also complete bullshit.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you're lying, he said "we should question if what we're told happened there that day actually happened"

but lets say he did say there was a hoax, and why not? the doctor who performed the autopsies said that the rifle was used to kill the kids but it found in the car when police arrived on the scene. but anyway, why do you feel it's ok for the left to shut down and attack people who question certain things, while push their own conspiracies?

why can't we question sandy hook? why can't we question a man found in his suicide-proof cell after the people guarding him went on a break and the camaras just happened to shut off... whys that "baseless" but 30 months of "but but russian robot hackers hacked our brains so we'd vote for the orange man" is ok?

it's ok sam, because the media tells you it's ok, and this is why people are laughing at our press in other parts of the world. and it has nothing to do with "sympaties" there you go again playing the emotional blackmail game, it's about having the freedom to question things.

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

Mueller concluded that Russia did everything to influence the outcome of the election in Trump's favor. Every intelligence expert to this day backs him up on that.

Trump is in power. His right hand man Bill Bar is in power. Epstein was under HIS custody. The Clintons are privates citizens. Your diseased mind blames them for everything, even when Epstein died under Bill Barr's custody. But your syphilitic brain probably thinks Hillary parachuted into his cell and personally choked him out.

It's funny. If Bill and Trump are both on those Epstein tapes committing unspeakable crimes, liberals will demand Bill goes to prison, but conservative will demand 4 more years!

That's the difference. You and your kind are pure evil.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you're not living in he real word, you know theres zero evidence to suggest the russian hacked our elections you know it. project veritas have videos of higher-ups from CNN saying "we know it's bullshit but if you throw enough shit, some will stick"

"if" "if" "if" "if" always with the "ifs" right? not facts just wants.

your bias is insane, in your retarded brain if the press tells you it's so, then it is right? you only have "ifs" and if you believe that a man in a suicide-proof cell, just happened to kill himself when the camaras broke, and the guards went on a break and he killed himself but he just happened to report that someone tried to kill him, and you don't see something wrong here?!!??!

if this guy leaned closer to the right then to the left, if he donated money to trump and not hillary you'd be pushing this conspiracy theory till the cows come home, but because it's not, you say less than harpo marx. so what does that mean? well another "liberal" complict in pedophilia. big shock!

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

"a man in a suicide-proof cell, just happened to kill himself when the camaras broke, and the guards went on a break and he killed himself but he just happened to report that someone tried to kill him, and you don't see something wrong here?!!??!"

Yes, dumbass. There might definitely be foul play. But you're a dumbass for blaming the Clintons, the people who are NOT in power, as apposed to Trump, the man WHO IS IN POWER. Epstein was under Bill Barr's custody. Bill Barr is Trump's right hand man. Wow, how do you even function day to day?

Every single intelligence agency has concluded Russia interfered in the election. End of that.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

there are people just as powerful, maybe more powerful than trump in this country, the CIA tried to use the italian mafia to get to fidel castro during the 50s, sam giancana, carlos marcello, with the promise of getting their casinos back, so yeah, there are people in this country with means and ways of doing things that are much deeper than even that of the CIA and the president.

I like how you go to extremes to try and belittle what i'm saying, "hillary parachuted in and whacked him" hahaha i like it, but we both know that the reach that clintons have would make it easy, and i'd say that about many families, even republicans, the term "the clinton body count" exists for a reason, whenever someone has gotten in their way, they have "commited suicide" what about seth rich? a mugging slash murder but he had his cell on him, wallet, watch? you know what i'm getting at, you're not that dumb.

as for russian interference, naaaa, you know it's crap. my real problem is that we can't question somethings, but have to accept others. and it all depends on who it helps. i just hate the bias.

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

Ha ha ha ha - now who's peddling conspiracy theories. "Clinton body count" exists because whackos like you keep peddling it. In reality, Bill couldn't even hide a little BJ, but apparently they can get away with dozens of murders, but not a little BJ. You're hilarious, kid.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

lets turn that around princess, lets see trump can't get away with saying "grab them by the pussy" but he can't get away with using a foriegn government to change the outcome of the elections in the most powerful country in the world, and he wasn't impeached?

you see how that works tiffany?! think about it

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i got you there! i know i did! thats why you've insulted me! i didn't say it was a criminal offense, tiffany. i simply asked why, like you did we can know something and not know others. i used your logic and even in that biased little mind of yours you saw i was right, so there came the insults.

this board is too easy for me

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

mine is light hearted banter "tiffany" due to your very feminine way of expressing yourself, "cunt" is clearly shows your anger, you're angry because you've lost.

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

like i say, my insults are playful banter, mocking your lack of masculinity, calling people "cunts" is something angry people do. you've lost the debate, a debate that asked why trump would want to investigate something you suggest he played a part in.

and i suppose that 1% unbiased part of your brain knows i'm right, so no counter-debate, just "cunt"

thanks tiffany

reply

[–] Jproof (40) 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

] Jproof (42) 3 minutes ago
[deleted]

smart move, now only i know that you're ignorant

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

No, I'm not lying. He may have tried to later walk it back a bit and "question what we're told" but he claimed in multiple blog posts prior that it was a hoax by the federal government. I don't expect you to believe the "Mainstream media" but take Fox News word for it:

A fired Florida Atlantic University professor who once said the Sandy Hook massacre was staged by the government to take away gun rights will try to convince the jury he was unlawfully dismissed from his position last year.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/axed-professor-who-called-sandy-hook-a-hoax-to-argue-free-speech-rights-were-violated

If you're child was gunned down by a madman in a mass slaying you'd probably understand why you shouldn't question something like that (when it very obviously wasn't a hoax). Fortunately the majority of us are capable of feeling empathy for other human beings and don't need to personally experience something to understand basic right from wrong.

Take a break from your conspiracy theories and relax a bit. Maybe watch some recent Colbert episodes (going strong...not in jail....tell us why you should have any credibility lol)

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

well we know colbert won't be arrested, his good buddy epstein just got clintoned. i'm all for stopping these conspiracy theories, so tell me, when we can expect to stop hearing how russian secret robot reptilian shapeshifters hacked our brains so we'd vote for the orange man!?

if the conspiracy theory damages a republican, then it's fact, if damages a democrat, then it's "baseless nutjob loons bla bla bla bla" right?!

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

lol go grab a slice at Comet Ping Pong and chill out.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

that shut you up...

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

PS, you've demonstrated zero connection between Epstein and Colbert, but won't stop you from spouting it as fact.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i have more proof that colbert was connected to epstein than you have that says russians meddled.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

And yet you’ve produced none..

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

touche

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

ROTFLMAO!

But-but-but-Hillary ordered a pizza for Chelsea's baby shower on her home landline, so that proves she's a pedophile! Plus she ordered 'extra cheese' - what more proof do you need?

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7717) 5 years ago

“well we know colbert won't be arrested, his good buddy epstein just got clintoned”

This is priceless
Is Oprah in on this also? Lol

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

no no, oprah no, just colbert. i thought it was rather obvious? or maybe you're a democrat, then it'd be normal to turn a blind eye to these things...-

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Blind eye to what exactly? You've provided nothing other than a failed prediction he was going to be arrested a month ago. In that same thread you stated:

a simple google search will tell you that for the last 5 or 6 years colbert has been no stranger to this type of talk, it's nothing new, nothing strange, nobody is picking a name out of thin air.

To which I replied:

Can you post any link where allegations of sexual misconduct have been made regarding Stephen Colbert? I can't find any. Earlier in this thread you said a simple google search would show he was no stranger to this type of talk but I haven't found anything.

To which you replied:

(crickets chirping)

When I google Stephen Colbert Sexual Misconduct the only thing I get are links regarding his calling for accountability for his (then) boss Les Moonves. If you have anything in the way of actual evidence to be evaluated that you can provide, please provide it. Otherwise you are the one with the strange relationship to conspiracy theories.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

Actor Who Accused Spielberg, Colbert Of Pedophilia Found Dead

https://thefederalistpapers.org/.../actor-accused-spielber...

15 may. 2019 - The actor had stated on Twitter that he was not suicidal and the death came after he accused Hollywood heavyweights of pedophilia sparking ...

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Is this really the best you have? The only mention of Colbert in this article is in the passage:

Over the past few days, he has been ramping up his social media posts to continue and accuse Green of being a child abuser, along with some big name Hollywood stars, some of which are just too unbelievable, including Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, Stephen Colbert, Bill Clinton, and Claire Grant. However, the tables have turned on Kappy, who is reportedly now under investigation by the LAPD for allegedly choking Paris Jackson at a party, threatening gun violence on social media, and harassing Green and his wife.

There's no demonstrable connection shown between Kappy and Colbert (or Hanks, Speilberg, Clinton, Grant). And while the article seems to hint that his death is suspicious it presents zero evidence that his death was anything other than the suicide it was ruled to be. Reading the below Fox article regarding his death, it seems there were witnesses that he did in fact jump on his own:

Two teens reportedly attempted to stop Kappy from jumping but were unsuccessful, and he was then struck by a passing vehicle.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/isaac-kappy-dead-bridge-suicide-trump-qanon

The article also documents him not seemingly in his right mind:

In August 2018, TMZ reported that Paris Jackson increased her security after Kappy allegedly choked her at a party and that police were investigating Kappy for allegedly harassing Green and his wife, Clare. He also allegedly posted a threatening tweet indicating that he was ready for a potential shootout with police.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

there are 1000s of google news articules linking cobert to something like this, go on youtube and type "colbert pizzagate" his own program, listen to the rant he goes into. read the comments on the video. it's surreal.

connections? well they just whacked an important link

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

ZERO evidence supporting him being whacked and plenty showing he was unstable and acted of his own free will. If this (an unstable individual who choked Paris Jackson and has no known connection to Colbert) is the best "evidence" you have to support your bullshit, then I don't think I have any more to discuss with you lol

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you're really that biased that you don't think something is strange here?

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

No, I'm really that rational.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

so a man that already reported an attack on his life, dies in a quote, unquote "suicide proof cell" while the camaras stopped working and the people guarding him went on a break, and you see nothing maybe even a little wrong there? not even a 1% part of your brain questions it?

maybe you don't wanna question it because the people implicated in it are the ones you believe in. look, i'm a republican, i voted for trump, if it came out that trump could have had something to do with it, i'd want it looked at, i'd be open and if found guility i'd want him hung by the balls.

i prefer truth to political bias, be it democrats, republicans, anyone, the fact you deny theres something strange here, just because bill clinton is heavy linked to this guy, sam it goes beyond party politics, it's endorsing pedophilia. and it scares the shit out of me that you can think like that. really, all politics aside, all our bantering on here, it scares the shit out of me.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Yeah sorry chief but I wasn't discussing the Epstein case with you (no desire to), I was discussing your bullsit about Colbert. I think there is plenty wrong with Epsteins suicide but I'm waiting to see what information rolls out before jumping to conclusions.

FYI I don't particularly like Bill Clinton so the idea that I'm skewing my views because of him is silly.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

theres a lot of things to link colbert with these people, and i'm not biased, i'm open, i really am, maybe it's bullshit, but the way he and the left-wing media are shutting all talk of this down, it's "interesting" thats all, but i don't know what all that has to do with tmz paris hilton and some guy who choked her.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Paris Jackson. And if there are any true links you haven't demonstrated any of them.

I like Colbert. I respect him as a comedian and as a man and will defend him until I'm given any valid reason not to. I can't say the same of Clinton.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

well thats fair enough, i just wish you'd have given the same benefit of the doubt to our president, who 2 and a half years later still can't be linked to any conspiracy with the russians. thats all....

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

Stephen Colbert Has Doubts About the Clinton-Epstein Conspiracy ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/.../stephen-colbert-trump-epstein-clintons.ht...
2 hours ago- After President Trump promoted a theory that the Clintons had masterminded Jeffrey Epstein's death, Colbert said, “They couldn't even ...

“This has set off a wave of wild conspiracy theories online. The sort of stuff that only unstable, tin-foil-hat loons could possibly believe. So, Donald Trump.” — STEPHEN COLBERT

mmmmmm, i know what you'll say "he's a talkshow hosts who adresses many subjects, especially those in the news"

and you'd be right, but why is he so aggresive? why am i not seeing the same kind of agression and attacks come from jimmy fallon? conan? and the rest? why is shutting down any free speech on pizzagate, on this of such importance to a run of the mill late night talk show host? why????? you'd only need to have a basic understanding of behaviour to know that this isn't a normal reaction. whats the saying? about protesting too much?

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Stephen Colbert is edgier and more political than Jimmy Fallon. Jimmy Fallon plays it safe. I can almost assure you that Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and Trevor Noah are also making jokes much like Stephen Colbert. I'm not a Bill Clinton fan but there is to date no evidence that he played any role in Epstein's death. If some comes to light, I'd like to see it but I deal in facts and I need to see some beyond "Clinton has connections to him so he must be responsible for his death." Otherwise it's a simple conspiracy theory unsupportable by any actual evidence.

I would also say you should avoid using the "protesting too much" line of attack considering how many tweets President Trump made protesting the Mueller investigation throughout the entire process.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i'm not trump, i just find it strange that someone who has been linked to pedophilia in the past, now decides to get all aggresive because people question a conspiracy theory that even you say is strange, no?

" I think there is plenty wrong with Epsteins suicide but I'm waiting to see what information rolls out before jumping to conclusions."

i don't know why you're bringing trump into it! i'm not the donald, i'm simply asking why is someone who already was linked to these things, decide to address it in such an aggresive way? edgy or not, this isn't being edgy, it's going on the defensive. it's strange, very strange

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Again, I've seen NOTHING that has linked Colbert to any of this in the past. I'm sorry a line from the unstable guy in the article you linked who also named Tom Hanks is truly meaningless. Epstein is the biggest story in the news, it's going to be covered by the late night hosts.

And you brought Trump in when you said you wished I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and I'm simply pointing out the guy you want me to give the benefit of the doubt to "protests too much".

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7717) 5 years ago

Lol! Your a piece of work Jimmy!

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

I know, but you love me anyway

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11747) 5 years ago

Nice to see the ABCNNBBCBS point out how all these conspiracies are dogwhistles endangering the Clintons and other top Democrats who were bff’s with Epstein.

Funny they’ve never made these conclusions on their 3 years of zero evidence Trump/Putin/Hitler/Nazi/BadOrangeMan conspiracies.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Leftists have been the primary drivers of conspiracy theories over the decades, though they lie and try to apply the "conspiracy theorist" label to conservatives. Some salient examples:

- JFK assassination: mostly fueled by leftists (e.g. Oliver Stone) wanting to believe he was killed by a secretive right wing cabal rather than the radical leftist Lee Harvey Oswald who actually killed him.

- US government invented AIDS: A KGB propaganda campaign called "Operation Infektion" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Infektion#Aftermath spread the rumor in left leaning Western publications in the 1980s. Liberals like it in part because it creates a new victim narrative for gay people, along with more ammunition against the US. Despite the KGB director admitting it at the end of the Cold War, and the technical impossibility of it being artificial given the disease being traced back to at least the mid-20th Century, surveys show as recently as 2005 almost 50% of US blacks believed AIDS was man made.

9/11 inside job - Both anti-American and anti-Bush (who, like every Republican president, is "WurS THATN Hitler!!!"). Though some non leftists like Alex Jones embraced this and other conspiracy theories, the 9/11 "truth" movement started with anti-American bigots in France and was mostly pushed by US leftists. At one point polls showed a majority of Dems believed it to some degree.

Trump/Russia "collusion" - We've all seen this insane idiocy play out over the past three years, and some liberals on this board still try to cling to it despite its debunking by the Mueller Report, among other things.

Some others include "blood for oil/Iraq", "blood for (nonexistent) pipeline/Afghanistan" (dishonestly pushed by the leftist BBC), and increasingly anti-Semitic tropes as the global alliance between Islamists and socialists, growing since 9/11, solidifies even in the US (see Omar saga).

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

they have a strange relationship with these things, the rather obvious becomes "whackjob conspiracy tinhat theories" if it doesn't serve their agenda, but then they say things like "no planes hit the twin towers" if it scores points for them..

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

The funniest juxtaposition is when leftists dismiss actual, documented facts showing real abuse of power by Obama/holdover DOJ officials as "conspiracy theories" in the same breath they talk about Trump/Russia "collusion" with a straight face.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

it's scary, i get we're all biased. but it becomes irrational with these people

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

The leftist mindset tends toward conspiracy theory generally as it's based on hating groups of people. Problems, real or imagined, are always some politically targeted group's fault, and the group is always sinister: business owners, white people (or an allegedly "white supremacist" system even making black cops do bad things), men ("good ol' boys' network"; "patriarchy"), Christians, etc..

Combine this need to blame every problem on a fixed category of political enemy with leftists' increasing detachment from both logic and empirical reality, necessary to cling to their ideology given the decisive empirical verdict of the Cold War and the difficulty in finding real anti-minority "racism" in the modern US, which has prompted an industry of divining alleged "hidden racism", and conspiracy theories will likely become more common, not less.

reply

[–] TimMC (9143) 5 years ago

AC is a partisan hack and freak and former CIA operative. Nothing he says should be believed.

reply