MovieChat Forums > Hereonlyforfun > Replies
Hereonlyforfun's Replies
Well, evidently in an attempt to try and start some sort of flame war you miss my original point: how could ANY person let an image like this be their official portrait, regardless of party affiliation. So, I'm not going to play your dingbat game.
No, I meant their own Eastern Sigourney Weaver-type CEO or a like-minded representative - and this goes back to the biggest question - why would the West and East enter into an agreement in the same race to create the best super-soldier.
That is unless the recruitment of such people was done without the knowledge of the East.
Oddly, the more one thinks about this flick, the more questions arise...
First, back to the purpose of the expendable people to be there - I feel it was both to keep the creatures in and people out and to hide what was going on. And I think the creatures wanted out to reproduce and spread and to probably eat. And that makes me wonder why none tried to escape all the time the two were down in the bowels of hell.
Next, if there was an East/West agreement, then where were those representing the East and why weren't they also responding? Or, did the West keep the true nature of what was going on from the East? Because why would both the East and West mutually agree to what was going on in the pursuit of super soldiers? That seems counterproductive.
I'm not trying to critique this thing to death and also, some of this may have been addressed and I missed it. Just curious. It is a good escapist type flick.
No, that is his DOD official photo. You MAGA people will defend anything.....and blame everyone but those with blame. Any smart person would have demanded a re-take and a demand to remove the Hulk's thumb.
Here is the link to it...
https://www.defense.gov/About/Biographies/Biography/Article/2418491/kashyap-p-patel/
what are you, like 12 and still fucking the family pet?
How is that someone with 1442 posts is not gone after posting shit like this? WTF is wrong with people?
I'm just curious, when you wash your white hood and sheet, do you do it in the washer or have it drycleaned??
Isn't it something the progress of the CGI in the first one when compared to this one? I remember when it came out the awe the special effects created. And, then we have even better stuff today (I saw a video on YouTube about what was real and not real in Netflix's Mindhunter and it was amazing what they did and what they added to the filmed scenes and in show that really wasn't a CGI sort of program).
Ignore this rant; apparently, the OP is upset there was not sufficient T&A.
The massacre was accurate.
I strongly disagree. I think Season 3 was the best season so far because it really delved into the characters and had more adult heart. Season One and Two were like Animal House regurgitations of the Shameless (American version) series on Showtime.
And I stand by my own interpretation - like the show Shrinking, the seasons of this show have specific themes and many are missing the theme of the third season - which is about growth and a butterfly emerging from a cocoon.
We'll see, but I think people like you are missing the overall arc of this show and how each season seems to have a theme.
To me, Season 3 was about the transition of the original sandwich shop into a five-star restaurant and all that comes along with that. It is also a chronicle of the growth and advancement of the characters.
I'm also confused why people seem to just watch the same stuff over and over again while missing the changing aspects of shows like this.
Wow, is there anything MC people don't bitch about???
Ah, unable to detect sardonic hyperbole.....
I like that - "anti woke man babies" - describes them perfectly.....
Back in October, Variety posted a chart of the top ten comic book movies of the past ten years and where they made their most box office cash at - in EVERY single one of them, foreign markets vastly out performed American theaters and to me, this is an indication of how globalization often has more of an impact on content versus that of what these "anti woke man babies" cry about.
Frankly, it's more about money than anything else and they are too vapid to think of that.
It is done this way where I am at, but different judges have different methods they use.
I bet you are real fun at a party.....
No, it is her acting. Purely one note.
From experience, it happens and more than you know. And especially in larger jurisdictions.
No, it wasn't. This happens. Been there, done that.
Sometimes I wonder if people even watch these films before asking questions clearly dealt with in the movie, which this topic was.
The judge made it clear - the defense attorney blew it by not asking MORE. The guy answered what his CURRENT employment was and the defense attorney went no further. More on the ball attorneys ask all sorts of exploratory questions in jury selection, but not always. Also, in the movie, it was made clear of the caseload carried by public defenders, too. So it is easy to imagine how this was missed.