MovieChat Forums > ShadowHunter > Replies
ShadowHunter's Replies
Wrong. its called the burden of proof. you dont get to make claims and others have to find your evidence for you. its like someone saying "Sasquatch exists". they dont get to say "its true just go find the evidence". no they have to give evidence.
you can reach me. provide evidence instead of being a lazy idiot
"Research it if you want to know"
in other words "do my work for me because im lazy"
go get evidence or be quiet
i think its the inconsistency. she talked about how important representation and diversity is when playing Maria. then all of a sudden its "nooo this is not a diversity race swap hire im actually super white see i can play snow white"
plus the smug talking down to people doesnt go over well. look how much more humble mega stars like Henry Caville and Hugh Jackman are. literally careers that dwarf Rachel and given her trajectory ones she will never rival. and yet she has 100X the ego.
no one likes a smug bitch/dick who talks down to people.
i couldnt imagine going from highschool to getting to star in westside, shazam then ballad and snowwhite, and not being completely humble and amazed and so happy for the opportunities. and instead just shits on the property and talks down to the fans.
she was likely not a good person before the fame and now its just coming out more.
no it mostly stems from her being a smug elitist who acts like shes beter than everyone.
just because people like you and Kowalski have no dignity and are little beta males doesnt mean the rest of us enjoy being talked down to.
notice how Disney freaked out, clearly told her to STFU and changed all the things people criticized. even they realized she went too far.
shes actually kinda fine when she tries
https://hips.hearstapps.com/ellnl.h-cdn.co/assets/15/37/2048x1024/2048x1024-met-ruby-rose-6153816-1-eng-gb-opinie-ben-ik-de-enige-die-alweer-helemaal-klaar-is-met-ruby-rose-jpg.jpg?resize=1200:*
but goes for the 14 year old boy look instead. oh well
people like humbless and being relatable. look at some of the stars 100000X bigger than zeggler with (at least from what we see) 10000 times smaller the ego.
who the hell enjoys a smug dick and talking down to people like Zeggler? esp one who people feel is a nobody failure who. well except Kowalski and her other defenders who like being emasculated because they are such weak cucks. but the rest of us have dignity.
left out Keelai.
this was one of the funniest things ive ever read and im on the left
when she tries to look like a women she actually looks decent
https://hips.hearstapps.com/ellnl.h-cdn.co/assets/15/37/2048x1024/2048x1024-met-ruby-rose-6153816-1-eng-gb-opinie-ben-ik-de-enige-die-alweer-helemaal-klaar-is-met-ruby-rose-jpg.jpg?resize=1200:*
if North koreas so great and its all Western propganda. why are people risking running through minefields and being shot in the back to escape it? why do they ALL have horror stories about it. why are guards stopping people leaving?
"How did Trump rig the egg prices in 2008?"
where did i say he did you idiot?
put the bleach down. its early and you seem to be on your second glass already from your utter nonsense posts somehow getting even more unhinged
what the hell are you talkng about?
https://www.hotcars.com/this-is-the-car-collection-of-north-koreas-secretive-kim-dynasty/
https://www.businessinsider.com/kim-jong-un-party-yacht-spotted-north-korea-suffers-famine-2021-7?r=US&IR=T
https://www.burgessyachts.com/en/buy-a-yacht/yachts-for-sale/yachts-over-200ft
his is only 180 foot granted but this 200 foot yatch is going for 45 million american
he doesnt need to be made to look bad. any totalitarian dictatorship whose country is in extreme poverty and has done the stuff they have is bad. you need to reflect on your own morals and morality
remmeber when you blames Joe for egg price fixing that happened in 2004?
then remember just now when you wanted joe to nationalize and control oil sales. then cry that he didnt?
stop drinking bleach. you are getting more imbecilic with every post
<blockquote> Well it's not what we, public, think.For us it's just fun to speculate and proclaim. But it's the producers and studios that make decisions. Don't be surprised if Lionsgate will decide to do more Hunger Games counting this as "moderate success". </blockquote>
i dont see the relevance of this to our convo. by most common indicators this has to make 350-400 million to break even. i can GUARANTEE you no second film will happen. its one thing to take a risk on a 40 million dollar film (like the whole nine yards) that doesnt cost as much to market. its another take a risk on a 100 million dollar one with likely 80-100 million dollar budget, when the first one didnt even do well and the second is going to do even worse.
<blockquote>Like that Walking Dead franshise. No one watched original show for years, </blockquote>
what the hell are you even talking about????
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walking_Dead_(season_1)#:~:text=The%20first%20season%20had%20an,in%20the%2018-49%20demographic.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/walking-dead-by-the-numbers-ratings-amc-1235265635/
<blockquote>The Walking Dead premiered to 5.35 million viewers, making it by far the biggest series debut AMC had seen to that point and one of the largest in cable history. The six-episode first season was fairly steady throughout its run, averaging 5.24 million viewers on the night it first aired.</blockquote>
in what world is AMCs biggest show ever and one of the largest shows in cable history EVER "no one watching".
/blockquote>There was this The Whole Nine Yards comedy with Bruce Willis and Mathew Perry in 2000. It had budget of 41 millions, and made 57 domestic + 28 international = 85 millions overall. We would say it flopped or barely broke even. But studio ordered sequel because for them it was success when they counted all the money they got from selling it after theatrical release.</blockquote>
are you just making stuff up at this point???
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0190138/credits/?ref_=bo_tt_tab
<blockquote>WORLDWIDE
$106,371,651</blockquote>
the film made money, was a relatively low risk, and didnt cost nearly as much in marketting as big blockbuster action films do. these smaller projects are safe for studios. less risk, but can still be a high reward if it takes off. its one thing taking a risk on a small comedy that costed 40 million and a small marketting budget, its another on a 100 million dollar with a huge marketting budget. you are now taking high risk for a proven low reward that will get even worse. and if it didnt do well at the box office, other companys arent exactly clambering to buy rights to show it on their streaming or tv channel as filler. and what they make goes down even more. you think they are paying top buck to rerun or stream LOTR or a ballad of songbirds and snakes?
also the second film the whole ten yards crashed. if these films not recouping money at the box office is so insignificant since studios can just make tonnes of cash back later in other formats, where was the whole Eleven yards?
i mean they dont release the marketting budget but the "rule of thumb" on these types of films is marketting is equal to production. what you think they spent 10 million in marketting? 20 million? its a "big" franchise and they invested 100 million in the production. they aint about to let it go unnoticed and risk a 100 million dollar production budget by under marketting.
https://collider.com/hunger-games-ballad-of-songbirds-and-snakes-box-office-budget/#:~:text=At%20a%20reported%20production%20budget,between%20%24165%20million%20and%20%24200
"At a reported production budget of $100 million (making it the second least-expensive film in the series next to the original The Hunger Games at $78 million) and a likely marketing budget of $100 million, "
<blockquote>Don't forget they they sell movie countless times to tv showing, to streamers etc. There used to be dvd. Could be toys, merchandise.</blockquote>
NO now you are trying to speculate on later sales unrelated to the movie theatre. i see this bullshit defence all the time to defend movies that flopped at the BO. please stop we both know its bullshit. we are talking about one metric, box office. you are trying to bring all those things in we know even less about comapred to budget and thier economic impact to save this movie face.
you could say that about almost any big movie flop ever to claim it didnt really flop. we dont have those numbers, we never will. thats beyond pure speculation and a completely unknown variable we are discussing one thing here. box office.
i googled various sources they all seemed to agree around 5 billion. believe me fox isnt my go to normally. also the dude controls an entire country as an absolute totalitarian dictator. he owns EVERYTHING in North korea. its not out of the realm of possibility at all and is entirely plausible and likely. what you suggesting hes a millionaire? has only 3 million?
it seems like itll barely break even or lose money. often blockbusters like this have a matching marketting budget. but of course we cant know for sure.
400 million would be a safe number to assume break even. its currently at 137 millon
movie studios dont make films to break even.
<blockquote>Zelenskyy? </blockquote>
evidence please
<blockquote>And by the way where do you get the information that Kim is a billionaire?</blockquote>
https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/how-much-is-kim-jong-un-worth
multiple palces all ageee. some include all the assets etc of North korea since he bascially own the country and put his worth in the trillions.