MovieChat Forums > JustSparks > Replies
JustSparks's Replies
Apparently so good that the director became obsessed and insisted she be topless.
You'd think they'd try a little harder to find an actress with a nice body for an erotic film with so much nudity. Emma's behind is non-existent and her breasts are so far apart from each other, they're like Anya Taylor Joy's eyes except not cute, just sad.
We'll see who is laughing when Jenna's nudes leak and everyone agrees that X was better off without her 'boobs' in it.
Laugh emoji all you want, that's just what I think. It's not like Jenna is more famous than her nude co-stars. If the director wanted her nude, she'd be nude (or replaced). She's the only character whose sex scene is entirely off screen. Why? You do the math. Shitty titties.
Mia Goth and even Brittany Snow have much nicer bodies than Jenna, from what I've seen. Most likely she (or the director) knew she couldn't "stack up" so she just kept her clothes on to avoid embarrassment.
Not exactly a high bar... but I'd still disagree. Keira's are tiny but at least they're perky. Emma Watson's are almost as small, but they're saggy and shapeless.
I peeked at them just cause I was curious. If you're interested in remaining attracted to her though, I wouldn't go searching for them. Her tits are incredibly disappointing.
She has topless paparazzi photos. Her boobs aren't great, in fact they're quite bad, most likely she will never show them out of embarrassment. Few directors would let her anyway, I imagine.
Someone who claimed to go to high school with her and posted a yearbook photo said it, but even in the off-chance they actually did go to school with her, they could still be lying. No one here seems to know about it so it's probably BS
I heard from your mom that I wet her bed.
I don't what?
This can't be NSFW. Hailee refuses to show the goods
She's pretty and has great knockers. That's about it.
She has great boobs and basically nothing else going on. I'm sure she was devastated by all the attention her "mistake" brought her. Seriously, why would she mention it on Conan if she didn't want to people to see them?
The butt shot is suspicious because... it shows her butt, not her face? Yeah, basic anatomy dictates that you have to go out of your way to show both at once. It wouldn't have made sense in the scene. I believe her. She shortly thereafter did a topless scene that was obviously her, so it's not like she has any inhibitions about nudity.
She tweeted that it was hers. I don't see why she would lie about that, and it looks like her butt.
Yeah that's not it pal. Attractive voluptuous bodies are just in the minority, so of course most actors won't have them, and that has nothing to do with the quality of the media. Emma is easily the best part of this film and replacing them with Daddario (who is an incredibly awful actress) would have ruined it. Emma is quite fit, and the fact that their body is not nearly as attractive as someone like Alexandra Daddario's is not their fault.
It was fine. I'm not sure we really needed another adaptation of this, but it was enjoyable enough.
I saw it, Emma Corrin is totally nude, a lot. Whether you consider that female nudity is up to you, but Lady Chatterley is definitively a woman, with a woman's body. Not a particularly feminine body, but there's something at least resembling tits on there.
Well you can see them free of charge. They're definitely not her best feature, I'll give you that