MovieChat Forums > DevonteHuntley > Replies
DevonteHuntley's Replies
Yeah because it didn't take you 24 hours two days ago to come up with your sloppy joe you pathetic HO. I suggest you get crushed by the next 911 attack that comes your way and your way only!
PENIS FACE!!! WHO'S GONNA WANT YOU SLOPPY SEMEN??
I mean a shift to an afterlife has to be done organically like the sequel has to build up to it rather than throw it out there as if the first movie set up this realm, which it didn't. I have a thriller duology where the first is grounded and the sequel explores into supernatural/afterlife territory but it happens progressively over the story starting with a ghost sighting and then a character entering an afterlife while on life support.
The second idea just sounds like a really bad cop out. No thanks.
GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND LEARN HOW TO SPELL. BOOGER EATER.
LITTLE BOY, GO TO BED ALREADY. NO ONE CARES.
You can't spell period and need to go back to school. You're a liability and need to be cannibalized.
Wait, did Gladiators even depict anything supernatural to hint at such a story outline? The first seemed pretty grounded. Quite a change in direction.
Little girl, shut up already and learn to appreciate things you want to hate on that have better quality and talent than you (like the Star Wars prequels and Jake Lloyd) or better yet, movies you haven't even seen like 1925 Wizard of Oz. :P
I'm not. Just defending Jake and coming at you. Seems like Jake should literally CUM at you if you catch my drift. ;)
That's FAGGOT. If you're gonna insult me then spell the word right you broken pair of groin protectors. You never even seen 1925 Wizard of Oz so get sucked up by a twister on THAT note you bigoted Brit.
You are the dipshit that comes out of Jake Lloyd's ass. Eat my dirty socks.
Have you even SEEN the 1925 version? No. This is probably the first time you've heard about it so how are you going to judge it? I suggest you shut the fuck up. The special effects for the twister and the lightning strikes and the travel t Oz was remarkable for its time. The movie is nearing a century old too so show it some respect.
Don't really care much for the HP movies following the second (or third depending on my mood) and you can find Return to Oz to be a better sequel all you want but at least Gladiator II has better consistency to its predecessor to also be an OFFICIAL sequel.
EAT MY BUTT HOLE. :)
Dude you're a moron. Return to Oz is credited as an UNOFFICIAL sequel, meaning not really a sequel. The 1925 version was part of the silent era so of course it wasn't bound to be all popular when a well-known and bigger budget with sound and color version would come along years later and overshadow it. I doubt you've seen the 1925 version to even judge it. It had wonderful special effects for it's time.
I get sequels get dark and change stuff, but guess that? The wat Return to Oz did it is not genuine since it still has the change in time, actors, and designs entirely (mainly due to a rights issue with MGM not to use certain things). At least when the Harry Potter movies got dark by the third movie there were still similar things still carried over from the first two. Speaking of HP, yet, the time gap between 1 and 2 would be shorter if my scenario were to be the case but my point still stands. A book series with consecutive books meant to be adapted over a short period of time shouldn't be done 20+ years apart from each other that will require significant changes. To have one first entry with this cast and style and then have succeeding entries done with an entirely new cast and style is weird. Best to remake the first story and then go from there. DEAL WITH IT. And I don't care about Sorcerer's Stone being "dark". I was making a point of they just waited to make the sequel decades later, not saying it compares to the 1939 Oz movie in being lighthearted and cheesy. Way to argue over something non-existent.
Jake is a fine actor simply following direction. His acting in Star Wars was nothing bad. I've seen worse. You clearly haven't seen anything that amounts to bad if you think he had it all. And you can also shut the hell up because it seems you just want to banter and get the last word. The ball floats the same in your end too with this dear. You can stop talking altogether.
I'm not making any mountains here. I'm just saying, they were best off remaking Wizard of Oz (itself a remake from the 1925 version) and going from there. Trying to make a sort-of sequel and sort-of reboot was just odd. The two movies are vastly different and might as well be in different continuities. Remaking for the sake of keeping the tone and same actors around if this is to be a potential long-running series is actually a great idea than making a 40+ year sequel with a whole new modern style, different designs, and cast altogether because you want to maintain that original movie and have it be somewhat of a connection. IT DOESN'T WORK. Imagine if they did the first Harry Potter movie in 2001 and then now decided to do Chamber of Secrets. They're best redoing that first book and THEN doing Chamber of Secrets for consistency of the same actors, same designs, same whatever than it would be going from a rather older movie to something modern that would require significant changes.
End of discussion THERE.
You're just a Star Wars prequel/Jake hater. That's pathetic. If it was going to be garage no one would have part-took in it or told George to change this and cast that.
Now let's in fact end this discussion since it's gotten nowhere and you're talking my ears off making this thread longer than it needs to be.
The doll is the pimples on your flat butt, CLOWN.
A spinoff character is connected by the actor, you don't recast them and nine seasons into a show, ridiculous. They should have talked JoMarie into staying, but I feel they had strife with her likely due to her issues with Jaleel and the show's direction. The bizarre recasting was their way of being shady and showing how little she meant to them. Yeah, she was the reason the show existed since it was to be about her and her family, but Steve came in and took over and he was the face of it to them and not her. If Jaleel were to leave would they recast him? Nope.
I read an article years back on which one of the producers said they didn't want to kill her off or divorce her and Carl, but they could have handled that better. The recasting would have worked better if they wrote the change into the show and given Steve's wacky inventions, they could have pulled this off. Harriette wants to look younger so she jumps in Steve's chamber to do so, but she winds up looking different. The machine breaks and Steve is gonna need to take some time to fix it so she, the family, and others have to adjust to her new look for god knows how long until JoMarie was able to return. I would have liked that approach because it respects the continuity and JoMarie's appearance.
Jaleel recently did an interview with The Breakfast Club podcast promoting his book, denying the altercation. He even asked the hosts, "Why does her word validate over mine?" or something along those lines and even claiming it's odd something like that would come out twenty years later to further prove how wrong this is, but it's not really a good argument because things like that can be kept hidden. He doesn't strike me as a liar and neither does JoMarie, but there has to be some truth in this matter.
He did shed some light on why Judy wasn't given much to do because during table reads Jaimee Foxworth wasn't delivering her lines as good so they re-arranged the script and gave her the bear minimum. Also blames her mother for why she was kicked off the show though according to Jaimee in her own interview with Armon Wiggins, her mother was fighting to give her more to do on the show and this irked the producers who just decided to rid her entirely.
Return to Oz adapted quite a few books (which I hate when they do this). But to do this "somewhat of a continuation but not exactly" was a weird move. Remaking Oz wouldn't have been bad since it's been enough time to do so and if you're gonna adapt the other books in any way, it's only fitting so you could keep the same cast and provide a proper continuation. They were basically trying to collect their cake and eat it too.