Tonyharrison's Replies


Do you even understand you didn't answer my question first? The irony speaks for itself. Can you copy and paste your message again just to prove the paucity of your argument? You've copied and pasted your message again a fourth time despite my last post. I pointed out that copying and pasting your second last post doesn't address the point I already made. But you did that again in your last post. Copying and pasting your last post doesn't address the point I made. You haven't responded to my last point. I asked you the question first. I asked you the question first. Can you tell me who accused Cook of lying and what are their qualifications? Yes or no? You still haven't answered my question. Are the links you provided for peer reviewed research? Yes or no? "Cook has credentials, yet, he lied and falsified information." Who said that? Was their analysis peer reviewed? Once again, provide evidence that your sources are peer reviewed research. (I've already pointed out that Lord Monckton and Alex Epstein don't have any peer reviewed publications to their names.) I asked you about the scientific credentials of the authors of your links as "proof and evidence". You didn't answer and so far, can't account for their scientific credentials. So you don't deny that Alex Epstein, Lord Monckton, and the other people you quoted have no scientific credentials... got it. I'm happy to answer your question if I think they are wrong if you first of all answer my question if you agree that they don't have any scientific credentials. How about you answer my question first? So you agree that they don't have scientific credentials? They are 2 individuals in the links you provided. I assume you agree the answer is no. Then how about the scientific credentials of the other sources you provided? Do you accept that Alex Epstein and Lord Monckton are not experts and they don't have any credentials as climate scientists? I did read them. In fact, I pointed out that the links only cited non-experts like Alex Epstein and Lord Monckton to make their unscientific arguments. None of those 12 links come from climate science research organisations conducting peer reviewed research. As I said, any genuine climate science research organisation which conducts peer reviewed research will tell us the world is getting warmer: https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/eight-warmest-years-record-witness-upsurge-climate-change-impacts