MovieChat Forums > Sparky > Replies
Sparky's Replies
You feel you're in a place to recommend karma but can't defend the position? And I'm the ridiculous one?! This attempt to laugh your way out of the question won't work. Answer it.
But do you understand it? Are you in possession of the knowledge that would distinguish karma from crime? How can you say then that what may or may not have happened to jews in WWII wasn't karma?
So then you approve of such measures for your enemies. Still it's easy to judge ain't it?
Nice. I can expect you to scrub my back then? That hard to reach area?
Ossum- they're obviously getting the showers ready then right?
What I said is true about your statement. Whether the statement you made is true or false is not my responsibility. And advice? You gave none. But let's say you did- you block those that don't immediately heed your advice? No offense but you don't even understand the words being used here. If anyone needs advice it's you, and my advice to you is to shore up your educational fundamentals before you go attempting to preach to and change others. It's easy to perceive faults in others even when none are present, but most couldn't recognize their own faults if they were a growth on their face.
Hanks tries to switch the conversation to "Bachelor Party" he hates "Buddies" so much...
"You don't realize how absurd your argument is there?"
I didn't provide an argument I made a statement of fact.
I never claimed you were anywhere on the political spectrum. You are welcome to call anything what you want, it changes nothing. English changed over so many years but you can dig up and learn Old English and use it in public insisting that it is the true iteration, or you could use the modern parlance- you have free agency here.
I said I looked at the graph and I did. I saw those words, but there are no real measurements are there? And the description they provide that you quote here: "We have analysed speeches, manifestos and, crucially, voting records in the compilation of this chart" tells me nothing about their methodology. Actual studies are transparent while this one just essentially tells us 'trust us dude'. The last quote you provide there is a statement that declares something is either one thing or the other with no room for a grey area, the exact opposite of the method the graph uses.
Semantics will get you somewhere I guess. I looked at the link. The graph is four colors, I saw no information as to how they were plotted or what criteria was involved in their placement. Furthermore the 'information' has been provided by the site linked with no other credits given.
The Overton Window has indeed shifted and appears to be shifting again. In the end the Bard's words on names and their ultimate impact is applicable here, and the people have spoken. Are you attempting to sway my position on the terms used or something else?
Actually the Overton window has been pushed to the left quite a bit, but political opinions will vary. Your thoughts IMO suggest that the classic view of right v left is insufficient to properly represent the positions of at least some individuals. I don't fit easily into any classification either, and see others that feel similarly.
He seems to be trying to hobble the Military Industrial Complex, and while some will be stuck at the political framing this is the right move. Trump has the power, the respect and foreign policy to get it done most likely too.
Agreed on Gaza to some degree. With the others the US was jerked around for quite a while during Biden's reign and respect waned for the US, and rightly so btw. Trump's behaviors here are a demand for that respect back with a bit of interest I guess, and with lessons learned. Jimmy Carter was a fool for just giving the Panama Canal away, but even so it was done with certain conditions, conditions that were not observed. The US is not wrong to take the canal over at this point. Canada has potential but the government and the culture they insist on is holding them all back greatly. Would they benefit from being a 51st state? I dunno. I see them as being another liberal state but I'm not certain on their political statistics.
The US should never have gotten involved with Ukraine. The point of it all was to kill off the Christian population and it worked perfectly. The large jewish population was flown out when it all started for the most part. Now they intend to make Ukraine 'New Israel' since that is actually their homeland, or close to it. Holding any individual or group as an enemy simply due to tradition is not a good enough reason and a logical fallacy. If you haven't read Orwell's "1984" then please do. US 'allies' are mostly anything but. There is more in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
We know Trump replied to Bass, but has he addressed what Newsome has in mind for property owners?
She couldn't resist the manly animal magnetism of Mike. Testosterone was literally shooting out of his pores striking her, convincing her.
With ideas like this Trump should hire you the way that Skunk Baxter was identified and hired.
https://www.axios.com/2025/02/05/donald-trump-house-democrat-impeachment-articles
This is the proper way to look at it- a positive indication.
It was the 'irrational, obsessive female' description. Look at the hate, and judgement. This type can see the slightest of imperfections in others but remains blissfully unaware of his own transgressions.
Your title attributes the words to Trump but your post more honestly admits that it's NBC that said it.