MovieChat Forums > Moviegoer101 > Replies
Moviegoer101's Replies
so when you're out of arguments you're laughing? is that what they taught you at the clown school?
that argument has nothing to do with a current discussion, ethnic cleansings are historical fact that displaced the palestinians from the present day israel area, there is no point in denying it
well then, provide some draft agreements from israeli side that were establishing palestinian state on 1967 border( the border that is accepted by the UN as a basis for a palestinian state)
<i>The Palestinians are NOT all indigenous to that area!</i>
first of all palestinians were there before the balfour declaration, so they came there before zionists
also if you think that modern jews have a right to live there because bible says so then you can check the story of Samson in the old testament which mentions "Philistines from the city of Gaza"
as for the arabs in the israel, ethnic cleansings made sure that very few of them left, so they can't make any impact on israeli policies
israel was never serious about giving any land to palestinians, all the "offers" they've made were made just verbally without any official papers, if israel adhered to the international law and UN resolutions it would've never built settlements beyond it's 1967 border
what matters is the people that live on that land, they are supposed to stay there even if the land becomes part of one empire or another, displacing or ethnically cleansing them (as israel did and does) is a war crime, palestinians have a right of return to their land and this right is guaranteed by the UN
displacing and keeping a population of 2mn under a siege for more than a decade, denying their basic rights, periodically bombing them to serve a domestic agenda, and now cutting off water and food supplies is a lesser terrorism?
still no proof of beheaded infants, media has walked back on this story
https://nypost.com/2023/10/11/biden-ive-seen-pictures-of-terrorists-beheading-children-in-israel/
doesn't matter whether you like palestinians or not, it's their land
agreed, lawyers offered him $1m initially, which kinda means that the guy had a case against pepsi
after reading your comments it seems that you have no idea what is happening out there, sorry, i'd stick to the facts (minsk agreements, security guarantees), not to the msm claims that keep changing every month (bring back ussr, restore kiev russia, an insanity etc)
well, you should get your facts straight, first of all Finland and Sweden did not join nato yet. Second, do you have any proof that it is about restoring soviet union? Regarding Georgia, there already was a swift war between Russia and Georgia and after the georgian AF were defeated Russia chose to keep status quo, none of the Georgian territory was annexed. Also if you read Minsk agreements (which basically guaranteed that Ukraine will keep all of it's territory) you'd see that Putin tried hard and waited long enough for Ukraine to implement them. So to it seems to me that your argument is based on assumption. If you read the security guarantees you'll see that it is about nato. But still i feel like i need to reiterate my question, was it hard for the US to guarantee that ukraine would never join nato?
well if there never was an intention to take ukraine into nato then usa and nato should have stated that in their response to Putin's security guarantees. Was that hard to do? Unfortunately, all they said was "nato has an open door policy"
agreed, i always thought that the looney tunes were so much inferior to tom and jerry in terms of slapstick comedy, and when i watched The Looney Tunes Show i felt like the creators struck gold with putting all these characters in a sitcom format. It seems there are not that many people who feel the same way
Grow up here, did the UN label russia as a terrorist state? i know that this term is being tossed around casually in regard to any country that the west doesn't like, but really? a terrorist state? a nazi state? Russia invaded ukraine because it was on the course of becoming nato country. You should ask ukranian leadership why did they pursue a nato membership instead of following minsk agreements.
BTW still trying to figure out what makes a country a terrorist nazi state to you: an occupation? an annexation of another territory?
You see there is a strict definition of nazism and calling russian actions in ukraine a nazism is nothing but a populist statement. Do you consider usa a nazi country for the invasion of iraq? Also i think you should consider any country that continues to do business with russia as being supportive, because trade matters and votes in the UN don't
like it or not there are plenty of people supporting russia around the globe, of course you can label anyone who's opinion you don't like a russian bot, it's up to you
kudos to you for trying to figure it out for yourself, i suggest you to watch Patrick Lancaster videos on youtube, he's regularly interviewing people in those regions of Ukraine