MovieChat Forums > TheArgentinian > Replies
TheArgentinian's Replies
It's not a story that lends itself to stylization, ffs
I thought he was Nikolaj Coster-Waldau. Not a fan of the male model looks, personally.
He was unrealistically unprofessional.
she actually did pass on information. one of the lawyers said he has a confidential source or something like that.
The verdict is a BS happy ending. How is this movie hold in high steam?
It's called casual racism. Even the "good guys" were flawed people. This movie was ahead of its time.
Exactly. It's about how he's a changed man. How could anyone not get that ending?
Foot fetishists.
I was disappointed by the lack of nudity. Only a couple of scenes for an erotic film.
He did but the Academy only looks at high brow movies.
The message is highly relevant today.
You overthink this shit too much, man.
Ending was cringe? it's one of the most perfect callbacks to a movie opening!
That short moment where he's in the garden wearing the shades he looked cool af.
Plot-wise, yes. It's straight forward. But it's the themes and imagery that are worth analyzing by rewatching it.
I thought it was very underrated. There's a 4k boxset.
>And by this time Bogart was already a well known actor, with plenty of big roles to his name.
No, he wasn't'. This was his first lead. He had to beg for the role. Get your film history right.
I just read it's a 4 measly more minutes. Must be minor additions.
Who started the crusades, again?
He was old and served no purpose. Remember how the mother in law was set free after no one wanted to buy her?