HarlemEagle42's Replies


Yeah I missed the Rudd spoiler. Seeing it this weekend. That's the one thing in this movie's favor. Black is probably withholding something that will vindicate this movie's lackluster marketing. I found it average but watchable. I generally don't pile on movies like that. I didn't actually make mind Shia being cast. He was just okay. It's too bad he's gone crazy. It's longer than Justice League? Then it's gonna make a billion dollars instead of two billion. Disney can manage. Every summer has a movie like this nowadays: a sequel to a long running genre franchise which the critics decide that it's run its course. So they just pile on and cream the hell out of it. Even if it's perfectly harmless as blockbusters go. Last year it was Pirates 5. Whatever reason for Sally Hawkins to be naked again. You're kidding right? Are people so forgetful? "Point out on the doll where the movie touched you." Wu said the genetic material was corrupted. Perhaps that affected its capabilities. I enjoyed it about the same as the first JW. It's got better action and the characters are more likable. But the first one did have a better sense of pacing and buildup to that final battle. It's not terrible. It's set for a fall release. Good question actually. I guess people don't care about Kevin Costner like they used to. I think the OP is trolling. If anything we need more dinosaur movies. I'm down for future adaptations of the Lost World books by Doyle, Burroughs, and Haggard. I'm guessing there's more to the story but the trailer reminded me of Logan. The man just needs to stop making one every three months. Take five, dude, you earned it. Wut They'll be complaining about Disney not taking chances anymore or that they're not being released every year like before.