MovieChat Forums > janelsenor > Replies
janelsenor's Replies
Not really.
I liked it
I know all that and have read many articles that echo those sentiments. But I've not seen any where Don Coscarelli even hints that he "refuses" to work with Bruce again. If anything, he seems sad that Bruce didn't want to do it.
Do you have any sources about the Cascarelli/Campbell thing? Dude was trying to get Campbell to do a sequel for years.
He talked about tricking one guy to walk off the stage.
EDIT: That was in regards to his first Mr Olympia. The doc glosses over the 1980 comeback.
I heard the Paramount logo is there, but it fades to the Lucasfilm logo, and the movie starts. No mountain logo transition.
It was called Brodo Asogi in the novelization.
wut
I get mad duckets if I hype Disney on Movie-Chat. They know the weight of Movie-Chat posters opinions on the box office, and pay me $0.50 a post, yo!
A little lanky but she has a pretty face....
Great movie. And great to see Stallone step outside the box.
I agree. This is one thing T3 corrected, as it was shown that he was sent back with the directive not to kill.
Nah. Rogue One and Andor are top-notch.
Eh. Mixed bag.
I need some beer money. It's fun gettin paid to write on an obscure message board!
How would he know it's dogshit?
The trial in Love & Death makes it more believable. That is, if the event between Candy and Betty happened the way it did in the show.
Candy did have some cuts/missing nails as evidence of a struggle.
Again, if it happened the way it did in the show, Candy just went to pick up a swimsuit and Betty came at her with an axe. Candy obviously overdid it, but acted in self-defense. If the jury had an option for "overkill self-defense," that would be appropriate. But it wasn't murder.
Have you seen the movie yet?
Candy and her husband did eventually divorce.
She did have another affair, supposedly with her business partner's husband.
Honestly, Creed II relied on Rocky nostalgia so much, it felt more like a Rocky movie than a spinoff to me.