MovieChat Forums > Supermanofsteel > Replies
Supermanofsteel's Replies
Would be the best. But i think DC will continue with this Universe.
But I also think Batman and Superman should be younger (at their 20s) starting a Universe where the heroes are closer to retire than beginning their careers is not best decisiob in my opinion.
Thanks, have a nice day.
Yeah, we have all different tastes and opinions and that is great. But I think killing people doesn't make him worth to be part of the Justice Leage, because a team with that name makes it seem like only members with high morals are allowed there, and Batman would be an anti-hero rather a superhero.
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvkDcrbLP2s[/url]
Maybe it's harsh what I will say but I think WB used Snyder leaving the project as an oportunity to reshoot some of the scenes. WB probably wanted to fire him but they probably did't had time to hire another director at time so they stick with him.
True we will never get to see Snyders version but we should get to see it.
Because his parents were killed. Batman should know better than anyone how it is to lose someone, it makes him more human (he has above human characteristics like his inteligence), also killing is just an easy way to defeat the enemy and it's non heroic (Batman is a Super[b]hero[/b]).
Let's imagine a situation where Batman faces the Joker who is very close to defeat him and the only way that seems to make him get away of the situation would be to kill his archenemy.
But the writers show us a way where Batman defeats the Joker without him dying. That's awesome and creates tension.
If people were used of Batman killing it would be boring.
Also his parents were killed by someone using a gun . Batman taking the life of people with a gun makes him no better than Joe Chill, because he is doing what made him lose his parents.
Also I hated the way Two Face died in Batman Forever and that Batman didn't save Ras in Begins. In the 1989 Batman he may couldn't predict the Gargoyle falling, but if he did it's also not forgivable.
Jimmy Olsen is Supermans best friend. I'm sure he could have more importance in the films than Jenny simply because he has alot of stories in the comics.
Also Snyder said that he killed Olsen because there were no room in this universe. If they hadn't put Jenny there probably they wouldn't have killed him.
I ask myself how Marvel would handle Magneto after [spoiler]Pietro Maximoff died[/spoiler].
True. But Whedon hadn't ruined any film in the DCEU. So he had more support since Avengers was succesful.
The thing is... he maybe has no interest in playing another x-men role. I mean he is in the x-men franchise for 17 years.
If X-men goes to the MCU I doubt that Hugh Jackman will reprise his role. The franchise simply doesn't fit and Marvel will probably reboot it just like they did with Spider-Man.
It's actually 10 years that is needed for Marvel get the rights back. So fans must wait 8 more years to see the FF in the MCU.
I doubt we will se a Snyder cut. It is said that Snyders version of the film is unfinished and it would cost millions to complete it. Also Whedon did reshoots for a reason (Distance Snyders vision since WB didn't had anymore trust in him).
I actually prefer Jake Gyllenhal as Bruce Wayne than Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor, so a reboot with him would be fine. One thing I don't want is Christian Bale back, I don't think he was either a good Bruce Wayne neither Batman.
Actors I would cast would be Bradley Cooper (Sadly he is with Marvel now and doubt he would switch to the DCEU), or Collin Farrel.
Even broken, I think it would be better if he didn't kill either. I mean he is a superheo without powers, the his best characteristic is that he can beat his enemies without killing them, even in the most dangerous and difficult situations.
Also he did kill after his fight against Superman so atleast after that he should have not kill anyone but he did. And he not turning into a killer until he dies would be so awesome he is trained mentally for this kind of situations.
True he killed in the beginning but his no kill rule is so simbolic that it feels wrong to change it.
About Olsen he could have been in the place of Jenny. He maybe would not get a major role but atleast he would be there "alive".
Yeah it would.
Maybe, but if yes it wasn't alot.
Jake Gyllenhal was also supposed to play Batman and Bruce Wayne in Nolans films so I don't know how true it is. It is also said that Gyllenhal is the Matt Reeves choice and not WBs and that the studio doesn't like the choice either. So maybe rebooting maybe isn't a bad idea either.
I doubt Burton would ever been interested in a Justice League Film (he couldn't make every character gothic especially Superman and Wonder Woman) but Robert Zemeckis would have been a fine pick.
I remember you, you are the one that had a Mario avatar in IMDb, right?
But yeah, not making atleast a Billion is an emberrassment, (it actually should make, atleast 1,5 billion), but it isn't the film itself that should take the blame.
The fact that the previous films (minus Wonder Woman) had bad reception and Word of Mouth helped too.
Yeah Batman 1989 was awesome, would have fit better in a world with Superman, or The Flash.
It's incredible how WB decided to continue even though most of their Films were misses. True MOS BVS and SS made money but only because the viewers wanted to believe in this franchise. The box-office of this film shows that they should have beginn anew with a new plan, vision and tone. I really hate the dark filter.