MovieChat Forums > Heisenberg > Replies
Heisenberg's Replies
That's all possible, yet I believe Lemmon was also decent and not predatory in his relationships.
Spacey has clearly done something wrong and abusive.
Do you think their bond and common taste would have been enough for Jack to publicly stick with him?
Yaaaaawn......
Are you EVER gonna say anything interesting in your life?
Or is this pathetic, pointless trolling all you've got?
I have 6700 movie posts here, you have to pick on a few which are, obviously to anybody but the idiot troll, intended to be funny because abrasive.
You have 147 posts here, ALL of which are just BORING trollish attack on other users.
You are kindly invited to get off the planet asap.
Troll, you cannot even re-read anything.
That's not a required skill when all you want to do is troll.
The only one bitching and whining here is you, little cunt.
Nepotism has NO PLACE in arts.
Live with it.
I am going after the fact that the painters you mentioned, albeit great artists no doubt, are nobodies compared to the big names in history (like Leonardo).
1 no, he did
2 that has nothing to do with anything we are discussing here
3 that's your lame ass ethics? Since YOU don't have something, you think others should not have them either?
You should write a philosophy essay based on such strong values and morals, I'm sure it would be a success.
Ok, that's all true, but what does that mean?
That Skynet was a faulty or weak AI afterall in order to exist?
Or that a stronger (efficient) AI would not even exist because it would definitely not need to send any terminator back in time?
Fuck them all in the arse and their daddy too.
Leonardo Da Vinci was the bastard kid of a notary who never recognized him.
There you go, and that bunch on nepotism nobodies too.
No, it was always republican voters.
Read some news before posting your bullshit.
Not if I think he's crazy.
I would just be mad that he, a crazy man with crazy theories, hangs around my daughter.
NOT that, according to his crazy theories, he put her in danger.
Who the hell does that? (being mad at a loon for putting somebody in "danger" in their pretend world-no danger at all according to our real world).
Hey, you can always post it here too.
Fuck IMDB!
I watched it, didn't pay for it.
Still want my money back, that's how derivative and useless was. 4.0 out of 10.
"I'm certainly glad to still have a full head of hair at nearly twice that age...Long, lustrous, flowing locks at that!"
Spoken like a true heterosexual man.
That's a movie I'd like to see!
A family is under siege by a bunch of crazies. They have to fight for their survival. They block every entrance, organize their defense, make a strategy....and the husband locks himself up in the wardrobe behind the grandma's night gown, waiting for his wife kicks the shit out of everyone!
Come on, don't tell me it's not a funny idea!
Which part of YAAAAA A A AA AA A A AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWN was too difficult for you to understand?
Which part of Keanu?
Obviously.
Chat GPT:
shoot a sequel to Beetlejuice....
that's the result.
Clearly, clay was Federer's least favorite surface, but I doubt you can say he struggled on it:
Federer won the Roland Garros 1 time and 10 other titles, which makes him already a great clay player.
He got to the final at the French Open 5 times, and was defeated every fucking time by the greatest player on clay ever.
If it wasn't for Nadal, how many more titles would Federer have on clay?
Djokovic became the dominating player once Federer came down from his peak (solely due to his age advantage), and Nadal started to struggle against him too. He then took full advantage of the fact that everybody else was no match against these 3.
He is still an awesome player, just not as great as he looks from the stats.
That's why he's no.6 in my list after those other 5: Sampras had no clue about clay courts, nor was he willing to adapt his tennis, and he faced a bunch of clay specialists so it was rare to be great on every surface till the late 90s.
He was still amazing on grass and hard courts.
Agassi, who was more well rounded and better on clay, miracolously managed to complete a career grand slam, which was almost unheard of, but it was Federer and Nadal and later Djokovic that made it commonplace to dominate on every surface like it's easy.