FFNogoodnik's Replies


The article was from 2019, Trump was president in 2019. It was Trump's FAA that created the program. Trump blamed the Biden administration for creating it. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-provides-aviation-careers-people-disabilities This article is from 2019. LOL, when i read your comment I heard a horse in my head when i read "Frau Blücher". If ANYTHING it was 3 against HER. they ALWAYS let him have the last word, ALWAYS. If they were against him they would not have done that. [quote]There could be other genetic reasons why a light skinned Vulcan doesn't get cancer.[/quote] For instance the Vulcan sun itself is different than our sun. In fact it has three suns, which was the basis for one of the first Vulcan sitcom called "My Three Suns" but I digress, and because of this the radiation would be different. excellent explanation "It’s a very weak device prompt the audience to laugh at something that’s not even remotely jocular." Except that is not the reason for the laugh track at all/ The purpose of the laugh track was to make one feel that they are not the only one laughing at a joke. It stems back from when people would see plays and be with a live audience. "what I said in my OP rings true, ultimately he gave her many good things" He did it in a horrible way. It was as if a rapist expected the woman to be happy with him because he did not kill her. Her Uncle was in a position of power and could have given her and her mother an easier life. Instead he, for lack of a better word, blackmailed her into doing things. CATWOMAN Hey Kowalski was your account hacked? You did not use capitals. :) I have seen a lot of reactors react to Alien and it seems like people like it still so it does hold up. That was funny, thanks HTTPS://WWW.IMDB.COM/TITLE/TT0115277/?REF_=TT_TRV_CNN Corrected that for you. :) I know, I was responding to beauq81 who responded to you with "You do realize that the Brangelina movie was a remake?" My response was saying that the " Brangelina movie" (aka Brad Pitt an his wife) was not a remake It was a remake? It looks like it was a new idea for film or at least an idea that came from a book. That however does not make the film a remake. From the Wikipedia article: [quote] Screenwriter Simon Kinberg had an idea for a screenplay after listening to a couple of his friends who went to marriage therapy. He thought it sounded "aggressive and mercenary" and felt "it would make an interesting template for a relationship inside of an action film." Plagiarism accusations In 2006, New Zealand author Gavin Bishop accused the makers of the movie of plagiarizing his 1997 school book The Secret Lives of Mr and Mrs Smith, starring a husband and wife living apparently dull suburban lives but unbeknown to the other both work as spies, and said he intended to sue if a law firm willing to share proceeds if successful would approach him [/quote] where did you get the numbers that show 1/5 of the US watched it? As someone that loves Columbo, I obviously disagree with you. I loved watching him put together the pieces trying to figure out, as I had seen the crime occur, what piece did the killer miss that Columbo finds. I find it to be a nice change of pace from the standard "who did it" mystery where everyone can guess the killer because there are only 10 minutes left in the show and there is only one person left. While, I will not try to change your mind on the show I will correct one thing in your post: but it was not on every week. It was part of a series where several different detective shows would be on in the same time slot. So you may get only 6 or 7 Columbo episodes a year. I am generally fine with the first paragraph (and always was) although saying " they all had different excuses" could just be that they had valid reasons but she did not like them. My problem with the statement comes from " I do not need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work for him about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him." A film critic's job is to view a film, as a film, not from a 40 Year Old White guys perspective. That does not make any sense to do it that way. His audience would be severely limited. A film critic's job is to be able to understand who the film is for and review it that way. I have never seen a film review of a rom com get criticized because it did not have enough violence. the reason for that is the audience of a rom-com is not looking for violence in the film. As far as those voices not being heard my response is : 30 years ago I would have been 100% with her but in today's world with the internet and numerous ways to get your voice heard that is no a valid reason to be critical of the system. "Since Bill Murray and Harold Ramis were bigger names at that point than the rest of the cast, they were required to cut their hair shorter, but not to shave their entire heads." -- IMDB trivia section for the film