MovieChat Forums > blindfolded > Replies
blindfolded's Replies
Completely agree.
Duly noted.
We all appreciated your contribution and you are an inspiration for humanity.
Here is a cookie, an honorary degree, and a key to the city.
...which you took literally with a pair of aviators and a volleyball to prove them wrong.
That is the stretchiest stretch of an explanation that has ever stretched. LOL
OK.
This program has nothing to do with the flight school Top Gun. LOL
Not sure how you define the word failure. Reaching that mark would've saved their program, their plane, and their goal. That's actually how you define the word "success."
Please explain how this flight program successfully hitting their "fastest ever" mark would be considered anything bottom? Go ahead. Meanwhile, I could probably make a case for a program that is about to be defunded and shut down getting literally vaporized in the air being the literal bottom.
Completely agree. We can all argue all day about Kelly Mcginnis not being asked to come back because she's not the smoking hot bombshell she was 40 years ago, and the implied sexism in Hollywood...
The least they could've done is did some justice for her character.
Again, loved it too, that was my only nitpick considering the one guy ground crew guy considered him a great friend apparently...
Charlie was not mentioned at all, as if she never existed.
Hence, why it kind of bothered me that his character arc reverted a bit, also considering his character is much much older.
Yes. We were left that he had some character growth at the end, and didn't end up as the same rouge lone-wolf as he started, thereby earning the respect of Ice Man, no?
We're supposed to be impressed the nobility of him risking himself for the sakes of their program. He was specifically instructed by the crew exactly where their goal is, and what to do. There was no need to push it, now he's not only risking himself, he is risking the aircraft aka the entire program itself, nullifying his supposed purpose.
No, you just like to say that because you think it's a Trump card.
And anyone who has to continue to say to everyone "you missed the point" means the point was made shitty to begin with.
There very fact that you started a thread (not so subtly inserting thr word creepy) about Tom Cruise's looks and then continue rebuttals to people who reply to said looks.... Yes you are indeed hung up on his looks.
Your very premise is "He doesn't look cool because he's old."
Damn dude. Move on. 🤣
Robert Redford continued leading. Tom Hanks continues to lead. Denzel. Liam Neeson is still literally in movies kicking asses.
You seem to equate Tom Cruise's looks to his employability.
And yeah, it's pretty obvious you already didn't like Cruise from the start, and were rooting for this to fail.
Yeah, doesn't matter what you say you said.
Your bias against Cruise is front and center.
Doesn't take any gymnastics, just common sense.
Also...
Your prediction that the movie is garbage is way off. Majority of critics and audience strongly disagree. Of course, people who say that usually double-down and start nitpicking a plot hole, or a particular scene.... That's fine, you do you.
And as somebody pointed out, you do seem pretty hung up on how Tom Cruise looks, especially on a motorbike. 🤷♂️
Time will tell....
So you were posting a rhetorical question to lead off a message board thread? 🤔
And yes, I don't believe there is a statute of limitations on whether one should be riding a motorbike or smiling at their age.
Nope. They're leaning into the "Getting too old for this."
Not the end for Tom.
A lot of people are literally buying that he looks cool on a motorbike. And smiling.
You clearly don't, and that's fine, nobody's checking your opinion going into it.
Tom Cruise will be just fine.
I only buy white toilet paper. Shrug.
I can't take this post seriously hahahaha