MovieChat Forums > ADBruno1985 > Replies
ADBruno1985's Replies
^I feel like that won't actually happen, but I'm with you on both counts, that'd be awesome. And it'd be cool to have it be someone from outside the circle of suspicion. However, that kind of reveal, where they don't show her at all until then, would also make the movie lose something that gives them rewatch value: Going back and trying to figure out which killer is behind the mask in certain scenes based on who else is in the scene.
Agreed. They try their best to connect them to previous stories. Nancy was always a figure in some way in Billy's life, and Sidney knew her too, presumably many others did, even though she wasn't shown until 2. Roman was revealed to be the puppetmaster behind it all, lurking in the background, involved in Maureen's death, but not shown until 3. Sidney probably spent lots of time with Kate and Jill growing up, though never mentioned or seen until 4. They put Amber in Stu's house. Richie's family of course existed prior to 6.
I feel like 6 hinted at a possibility of Gale becoming Ghost Face "some day." But I just can't see her going after Sidney.
Maybe Ghost Face will turn out to be the twins, as a way of branching them off from the Carpenter sisters. Say they killed them off-screen even. Heck, could even do all that and have Ghost Face be Sam and Tara's mom.
Willie is short for Wilhelmina. Probably not that uncommon of a name for when she was born, likely early 1900s.
You make a lot of valid points, but I still enjoy the movie.
To build on your point about the story being told in a different way. What has always bugged me about this adventure is that it just sort of *happens* to him on his way from escaping another adventure. He has little narrative autonomy. He literally just crash lands into the story. In the rest of them, he actively sought something out.
-g supernatural stalker moments.
It bums me out that the three most recent seasons are my least, in that order. So I hope next season turns it around and returns to form. I for one would like a season about werewolves, maybe in a winter setting, I feel like those are among the few things the show's not done yet. But, even when complaining, I still enjoyed Delicate more than I wanted to watch anything else in that time slot
If you're unwilling to put in the time to finish it in its entirety, you don't really have much point beyond it not being for you.
And yes, the kids are annoying, AJ more so, but he was meant to reflect what Tony disliked in himself
How dare you put that spoiler in the comments?! Maybe they haven't seen Big Bang Theory yet either!
Good little catch, thank you.
Maybe we need a follow-up movie about Amy ;)
LMAO. Troll.
I don't believe for a second that someone who's so invested as to be mad about it being a "spoiler." We knew it was coming since before the show even began.
They wanted to be sure to expose me to the good stuff. They also showed me Halloween, The Fog, A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Birds, and so on.
I agree with you.
Also, yeah, a very generational preference. People who don't like it today don't like it because it's lame and not thrilling. You need to put yourself in the mindset of the day. Anyone who was around for its release and didn't like it, that I've encountered, thought it was "too much" and they just "don't care for those kinds of movies." You won't hear someone from back then saying they don' like it because it's underwhelming.
Fwiw I was born in 1985, I'm just a huge film buff. But I remember when I was around 10 and getting into scary stuff, my parents rented me a VHS copy of this. Watched it with popcorn, and all the lights off. Maybe a candle or two lit. Set the stage, make it spooky. I've loved it ever since, and have it on dvd, along with many other Hitchcock films. Mixed on the sequels. Loved the Bates Motel series even though I initially thought it sounded like a poor idea
Well there's a case for Last Crusade
I am 99% gay and she's one of those ladies that just, oh yes. Beyond being gorgeous, she's clearly intelligent and well-spoken, and even if she's not a wonderful person, she's a good enough actor to make you feel like she is
Nvm, you're right, I went to find it to show you and then discovered I'd seen an old one for The Force Awakens redone for this one.
I would guess because he didn't want to do that much of a deep dive. Explaining their motives would've taken time away from the already long movie. Maybe he couldn't find the right spot for it? Plus if it's not fully explained, it adds to the intrigue of the story. It was just narrative choice, and I think a sound one. Clearly QT doesn't shy away from racism in his movies, and I don't think he tends to pander to anyone, let alone conservatives. I don't make it a point to follow all celebs' politics, but if anything he strikes me as more libertarian
Thanks. Just baffled why I'm seeing stuff like it already occurred. And baffled why it hasn't.
I have Paramount+, just checked there, nada. All the specials they've done, and Bigger Longer and Uncut, but no regular episodes, new or old
You kind of disproved your own point there.
If one were made today, and it was with women and not men, it wouldn't be catering to the woke left. It'd be catering to the sleepy right because those kinds of men think "two guys is gross, but two girls is hot," and they can't fathom the idea of something being made without them being the target audience in mind. Because those people think that everything has to cater to them. Which is why minorities can't have anything without having to fight for it.
I know, that was so satisfying
Lmao that's horrible but I wish moviechat had a laugh react
Don't even put that in the universe. Can just imagine the marketing though, "In space, no one can hear you... SCREAM"