Michael_essien's Replies


Yeah maybe although it was neither explained nor displayed at all. (Aside from the reveal that she'd completely forgot she'd been there before) He makes other comments like using the term 'boy' and making reference to gospel music. And then when he asks John boyegas character if one of the suspects told him where the gun was and boyega told him no "And he didn't even tell you huh?" It's not the kind of overt racism you get in some films but it's very clear that he in fact prejudicial against black people Yes I get the communal aspect but you can still have that sense of community without everyone living together in one building at night (although I accept there might not be enough housing for everyone otherwise) I spent eight million dollars on this. Max Fischer: And is that all you're willing to spend? That's correct, the only difference is the audiences perspective, we know sara didn't do we assume gabe did (as you would). They both think each other is the killer. If Gabe is being a bit smug it's just his knowledge that he's found the killer and he can tell how scared she is (although that's because she thinks he's the killer) I thought maybe he applied for a role as a homeless person but changed his appearance sufficiently that nobody recognized him? It's a bit far fetched but there's probably about twenty or so years between the drowning and that scene (assuming Truman is 30 something) She's a phenomenal actress, although I do agree the accent didn't work if she was meant to be an American native The actual answer is he would have ran away. Because he knew what would happen to him once Marcellus found out. Which ironically would have prolonged his life (maybe not for that much longer though) I agree with you, didn't work for me completely. That opening scene though has to be in the mix for best tarantino scene. The bar scene was the other part of the film which I enjoyed( but it went on a bit long) Nothing else really stands out that much aside from waltz for steals the whole film Don't believe everything you read, losts ending was really quite good (compare it to game of thrones which dropped the ball in many ways) The problem with lost was the writing got a bit sloppy before the end and they didn't tie up everything. The ending itself works though Yes I guess since each choice Is independent you'd expect on average half of them to survive. It's not great odds though for a 3 level game. Re squid game, it looks like they had shoes initially but when they came to jump on the panels they were all barefooted (were their shoes maybe taken off them?) As it turns out, not many. Squid game one was actually worse because you couldn't really take it in turns as such. And there was more glass panels than there were doors. Alice in borderland one would just need ten people to ensure someone survived I guess it wasn't much worse than squid game's glass bridge challenge (basically a 50-50 shot each time) Kate. Also Naomi (black operative from the boat) is underrated The psychological elements might be challenging for some (think I saw some people leave the cinema when the film started getting a bit darker) Although it's got nothing on midsommar in that regard. I thought it was executed pretty well, it's not the type of film I'm going to want to see again soon, however I'd recommend "time crimes" (2007) And predestination Yeah give it a miss In that it's terrible? Yeah pretty much on point I've just watched it for the first time and in my opinion you really don't need to I'd estimate around 15 times. Genuinely one of my favorites films, Cusack/driver chemistry is off the charts and only matched by Cusack/aykroyd