MovieChat Forums > Wilson > Replies
Wilson's Replies
Oh deary me. The Mary Whitehouse fan service club will no doubt overlook your aggressive words as you are in league with them but I'm sure some people will take umbrage at your violent language.
I do hope it doesn't put anyone off from taking part in discussions here.
Do you want daddy to kiss it better?
Sure you didn't want that big red truck toy, sure. It's not like you were already pretending to drive it with your other buddies here looking to get their big truck toys too.
Yes the cussing is what got my attention. Certain words for certain people...fuck that.
Who writes these rules and how far back in their family tree do I have to go to find a criminal?
"But in absence of those communities are going to "police" themselves."
We are still trying to find a sense of community here. Those trying to gain power by imposing their restrictive rules over others are policing nothing. They are trying a power-grab and that's why I am against. Particularly with the way they speak on others' behalves without any permissions to do so. Most uppity and entitled oppressors if you ask me.
The moderator has found no fault with me and so I hope to be treated with the same respect any other member here should be treated with. My actions are what are important not inferences of them by no good tyrants.
At least I know Jim won't be appointing you or any of your ilk as moderators.
That's the only victory I am aiming for and it's well in the bag.
You get back to your coven and plan the next brew of bullshit to harp on about.
Bye!
You really have no clue do you?
Cobblers, shoes = <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Cobblers%2C+shoes">this</a>.
Loads and loads of custom shoe makers calling themselves cobblers. Even a union of cobblers!
I might even eat some cobbler whilst visiting a cobbler looking for a good set boots to climb The Cobbler.
Cobble cobble.
Yeah, you're not coming off looking any better for this napsdufroid and when you delete your posts you know your name is still attached to them.
Bark lil' doggy, bark like a big doggie would.
I'm easy on the cussing personally. If Jim wants to allow it then fine, if he doesn't then also fine by me. Someone suggested an automatic script which could hide/alter cusses depending upon what a user's personal references are - I think that's the best suggestion if it's not too much work. Filters like that already exist as browser addons though for those who really don't want to see any cussing on their internet.
I just think it's a gaggle of gossiping busybodies wanting to ruin other people's fun by stating that their way is the only way.
Ain't nobody got no time for that outside of Tumblr and Twitter.
The harassment was palpable, hence my annoyance at it.
This little kangaroo court is extremely dangerous and the fact that they can't see that makes them even moreso.
I poo-poo all their shitty little contrivances and attempts at establishing rules.
Give me democracy and a system I can see working, not some made-up fantasy where only those in the know pretend that there's any sense of civility or integrity to their dictatorship.
CITATION REQUIRED!!
The voices in your head don't count as trustworthy eye-witness accounts napsdufroid.
So you do know that lots of custom made shoe makers call themselves cobblers and that the list of examples is rather extensive.
Run along now, everyone totally believes you got one up on me with your imaginings. Their lack of saying so just proves it. You totally didn't get pwned, honest.
By eck' Ye gads!
More paranoia and hushed whispering about who might be who and what "The group" thinks about them when they've not posting anything.
If you've got something to say then come out with it but gossiping over knitting ain't my thing and I find it feeble-minded to the extreme.
Like a cobbler would do?
I think that is an excellent idea MinaVladimir!
The issue here is that some people are wanting to get the rules they think the site should adhere to implemented and dismissing ideas they don't find appealing. Whilst that is their right to express themselves and their opinions they hold no rack higher or lower than any other member here at MovieChat and trying to strong-arm individuals into conforming to their mindset is not only undemocratic, bullying and presumptuous but it completely lacks personal reflection and the empathy to relate to others and that is a failing in any governance system.
What Jim says goes as far as I'm concerned and if someone wants to impose their ruling over some boards then they can go and buy their own domain and code it as they see fit. Trying to sabotage someone else's work and use fictional "Amounts" of apparent unspoken "Sentiment" is just a little Hitler looking to get their jollies and as far as I'm concerned that's trolling.
Once Jim gets the rules up people will adhere to them, until then they can just shut the fuck up as far as I'm concerned.
"Fits some people here like a custom-made shoe"
If you mean cobbled together then have a high-five for the witty pun.
That's the reason why I jump.
The ignore button is there for precisely this reason.
YO YO!
Can I get some litigation shit going on in here please?
Quite clearly I am being picked on here.
Look at theses replies! Blocked 4 times!!
Yup, time for theses children to be put into the sin bin.
I am shocked that this is expected to be treated as normal, what a state for new-comers to find. You should all be ashamed!
Catbookss should be banned and anyone saying otherwise should bet a permanent KKK label attacched to their account.
The puled pork sounds the closest to cook on that list
Canned soup?
I can't say I've ever tried it.