MovieChat Forums > napsdufroid > Replies
napsdufroid's Replies
Nope. Not the first time he's disappeared. Not a ban. He always pulls his horns in when he's proven wrong on here.
And I have a question for you. You have no problem criticizing me. Why not apply that to the psychopath who was nasty to the OP here for absolutely no reason? Didn't see you taking it to task for that; asking it what it was hoping to accomplish by being a rude AH. Go try that for a while and let me know how it works out for you.
Really? You mean the way they let certain posters get away with pretty much everything? The way they give some posters bans and some a wrist-slap? Don't take my word alone; there's plenty of evidence here they do just that.
You always have the option to scroll past.
Sorry, calling someone out for wishing you dead, then saying it's no big deal is not creating artificial drama. Whining about being lonely/hating men, accusing people of conspiring against it, lashing out at almost everyone, creating lies... THAT'S creating artificial drama. So the issue is indeed what the psychopath is doing.
"So just to be safe we're going to attack any new posters"
Never said that, did I? It's not hard to tell the trolls from the actual posters.
"We are here, and we see it."
You may see it, but it apparently doesn't make a dent with many. What's more substantial than pointing out its nastiness, hypocrisy, anger, bullshit, and constant lying? But even you still choose to sympathize with it.
I'm not going to go into more specifics, because it's already been proven the mods here don't treat everyone equally.
As I said, if the posts bug you, don't read them.
You weren't the one wished dead. Not trying to bait it into anything. I really don't care if it responds. Just going to out every lie and Bs story it posts from now on.
As dar as GK and movieboy go, you call it baiting. I call it responding to zombies. And when one makes a statement about something insisting it's fact, particularly in what's happening in the world, they should be able to prove it instead of just repeating it.
First off, that comment didn't apply to you. The other poster I was referring to was ben. Sorry, Mina. You're wrong there.
"What about the ones that weren't trolls? Are those considered collateral damage?"
The very few who weren't proved that early on.
"What is this achieving? What is the end game here?"
No end game. Every time the psychopath lies or pulls its usual shit, it's gonna get called out.
"As I said, it's reached the point of spamming"
In your opinion. Actually it hasn't
"just as you can not read Barclays responses. See how that applies to various people and situations. If all she wants is attention, why give her that?"
When I'm called out, I'm gonna respond. When it's an obvious lie to garner sympathy, I'm gonna respond. I'm not the one giving it most of the attention by sympathizing with it.
"if we're jumping on new posters because they've asked a question, or because the number next to their user name is small?"
Again, depends on the question. You-know-who used all kinds of tacks, largely either putting down the site or starting out normal, then outing himself. The psychopath's very first post, which it has conveniently deleted, was about trolling. Others will remember. It also made a number of posts/comments putting down the site. And let's not forget the constant lashing out at anyone who criticizes it. Sorry, that's troll behavior.
" The bickering has moved to Jim's threads for god's sake! "
And who took it there, Mina? With a call-out post, no less? Again, no, I'm not gonna let that go unresponded to.
Not really, but you go on believing that. If you do some research, you'd see the protests are nothing new at all. You just hear about them more now because of social media/the internet
Cool!
Margo, it didn't stop at that. Both Dazed and I reported it. It went on a tirade about how it couldn't believe it was reported. You're welcome to check. Long as it continues to call me out, it's gonna get it back.
Christ knows why you apologized to an obvious psychopath, especially since it was unnecessary, but if it makes you feel better, God bless.
I have no problem with the OP. I do have a problem with being wished dead, and the poster saying "So what?" when called out on it, then lying like a cheap rug and sputtering fake outrage because it got reported.
Careful, Margo. It might wish you dead.
"Well the same should be told to Naps because the guy continues spreading lies about me and being extremely disrespectful towards me."
Nope. Haven't spread one lie. You're a troll; that's fact. If you're not (huge if), you're still a liar, crybaby, and all-around nasty be-atch
"he is a delusional person who doesn't listen to reason?"
Ummm... I'm not the one creating threads for no reason than to gain sympathy. I'm not the one constantly calling others out. I'm not the one who's being told its rude/hostile and denying it (that's called not listening). And I'm not the one wishing death on anyone. Keep talking shit. Seems to be all you're capable of.
yep
I think it was Irv...
Kane, I agree completely. Have been in some extremely exclusive stores and been treated with total respect and seriousness. But the other side of the coin is that I've been in some where you can feel the condescending attitude the second you walk in the door. Either the salespeople follow you as if they expect you to steal or ruin something, or they act as if there's no way yo could even begin to afford the merchandise and tend to be flip or even rude. Haven't been there is years, so perhaps it's changed, but Gucci used to be the worst. In Neiman's, I've encountered both types of salespeople; I'd say more were nicer than not. Harry Winston is pure class and treats everyone as if they're capable of writing a $5 million check for a diamond ring. But I agree; a store that makes one uncomfortable is going to lose a lot of potential patronage.
I'm not saying a damn thing.....but you know what I'm thinking.
Actually, Mina, I don't believe I ever called you a troll. If I did, can you please post the accusation?
And I haven't been accusing everyone and their mother. Most of those I did accuse turned out to be trolls and had their posts deleted.
"Are you operating on the principle "I'll just throw it out there, see if it sticks"? Is it paranoia? Is it a hobby?"
No, no, and no.
As far as "barclays" goes, sorry; someone wishes death on me and then continues to lie incessantly with call-out threads, then starts crying to get sympathy is gonna get it back. If it bothers you, I suggest not reading he responses.
You mocked her, troll.
"I don't like instgators."
So you don't like yourself, obviously.
"I've never done anything trolling on this site"
That could easily be the biggest lie you've ever posted here, troll. Beyond the other lies about you not attacking her, troll. As godeway said, you didn't have to comment at all, but you went out of your way to be nasty for no reason. Surprised you didn't wish her dead, troll. That's being a troll...which you most definitely are.
Gonna report me? Good. And you'll get reported for being nasty to a new poster -- the same thing you're crybabying about -- as well as calling me out again, troll.
Well said, Dewey.
Try these:
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyaYiUwAeFs[/url]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rsTMQeK9aM[/url]