So everything that happened was scene as though it was haunted and in her head, but why the hell was she able to get a hickey nightmare on elm st style?? I didn't think anything that happened in the 60s to her could be brought forward to the present day apart from that. we are to believe it was just like a dream that was haunted.
shareThat was the one thing that did not make sense to me. If I saw it again, I'd have to watch carefully if anyone or anything else could have caused it.
A lot of theaters are dropping Last Night in Soho tomorrow. People need to see it while they still can. Writer Stephen King saw it in a preview. He like it so much that he saw it again when it opened. He said he never did that before. A film director who saw it immediately offered a part to Anya Taylor-Joy.
1. "Stephen King"
He means nothing. He is the king of trashy writers until Dan Brown dethrone him. More prove to his bad taste: The Shining.
2. "A film director who saw it immediately offered a part to Anya Taylor-Joy."
It means nothing. And you're refer to Mad Max. Directors have a ton of reasons to hire a actor, but "good movie" isn't one of them. Everyone thinks The Matrix is a timeless classic, but the lead actor? OMG, what a robot. Everyone thinks Prometheus is trash, but the actor plays robot? OMG, what a great actor.
You get my point.
exactly my thoughts. at the start i thought she must be doing something physically while dreaming. That wasnt the case.
shareYes and the other inconsistent thing was that how could she see the 'stabbing' that never happened. unless the camera panned away which it didn't it actually showed her watch her get stabbed where it was trying to misdirect us. Perhaps they should have panned the camera away as the stabbing happened to make us think she was stabbed but not actually show it it makes no sense that she would have that vision only to misdirect the audience.
Love the movie but just a couple of things don't make sense
I presume the wound substantiated itself from her fantasy.
share