total flop
will flop harder than ant-flop....
shareIt will flop.harder than your barbie prediction
shareyeah sure no...
shareYou said barbie would flop but it made over a billion.
shareJust like JoWilli wrote!
shareHe said barbie would flop, he predicted wrong
shareHe wrote it would make over a Billion and he was right.
shareThat was after he edited it, keep up , his original post was that it would be a flop
shareRead the current post, keep up. He wrote it would make over a Billion and he was right.
shareYour not the brightest of sparks are you , when Barbie was released he wrote it would flop, when it was obvious that it wasn't going to flop, he edited his post to say it would make a billion.
shareVillage Idiot wrong again!
OP preserved: will flop harder than ant-flop....
Reports from some advance screenings are very good (I know, we've heard that before). The Latin representation is predicted to hit well, and it's targeted towards a young demographic. Budget is a relatively modest $120 million. I think it'll do okay. And I think Gunn will look on that as a good result.
sharethis didnt age very well...
shareHow long before the thread gets edited 🙄
shareI only edit for spelling/grammar mistakes.
shareThat’s a complete lie. Many posters have produced irrefutable proof that you edit posts depending on which way the wind blows. Please do not embarrass yourself further by denying it.
shareNo you don't , as you created a post that said barbie would flop and then you edited it after it was obvious it would not flop, screenshots were saved, you lost , we win
sharewill flop harder than ant-flop....
And yet he claims in response to my post above, “I only edit for spelling/grammar mistakes.”
sharewas I right or wrong?
WORLDWIDE
$129,288,072
total flop
posted 3 days ago by JoWilli (11575)
5 replies | jump to latest
will flop harder than ant-flop....
But he is right as always. Face it, Kowalski. JoWilli is basically God.
shareHE IS WRONG HALF THE TIME...HE ALSO EDITS HIS POSTS TO MAKE THEM RIGHT HALF THE TIME...YOU DO THE MATH.
sharehow come no one is trolling me on this guess? I only edit for grammar mistakes or sentence structure issues. sometimes I type too fast and what I am trying to say doesnt make any sense. if you want to mock me for this, then thats ok.
I said top gun 2 would make a billion and everyone mocked me...
[–] Aemstel (5) a year ago
1 billion? I somewhat expect this to flop. The nostalgia factor might save it somewhat if it's lucky. But I think it won't attract much of the marvel/starwars/pixar crowd. Those films gross a billion.
[–] LiquidOcelot (2182) a year ago
It will gross nowhere near 1 billion. More like $500m max and even that's generous.
[–] Volley (3309) a year ago
Under development forever, there probably should have been sequels in the 90s. Expectations may be too high for most. No doubt, people that had their first date at Top Gun will have a reunion date for Maverick, all these decades later. I’d say it gets $450m.
[–] WhereIsRent (961) a year ago
I'd love it to make that much. Sadly it probably won't even make half as much as Jurassic World 3 despite Top Gun most definitely looking like it'll be a much better film.
[–] realbullet1 (90) a year ago
Thinking this will make a billion worldwide is getting your hopes up way too high. I feel this might underperform domestically.
[–] TheArgentinian (3915) 2 months ago
You can't make 1 billion without young audiences and they don't give a fuck about Top Gun
[–] MartyDeniro (2577) 2 months ago
No, it doesn't. Horror is in the lower half at best in popularity and box office. Action, adventure, thriller, and comedy are all bigger genre stars than horror. I don't know if Top Gun will reach 1bil without China
No Cold War level tension + plane designs unchanged in 35 years = flop
posted 3 years ago by ManToTrust (1418)
30 replies | jump to latest
Title says it all.
EDIT EDIT EDIT
share[–] Aemstel (5) a year ago
1 billion? I somewhat expect this to flop. The nostalgia factor might save it somewhat if it's lucky. But I think it won't attract much of the marvel/starwars/pixar crowd. Those films gross a billion.
[–] LiquidOcelot (2182) a year ago
It will gross nowhere near 1 billion. More like $500m max and even that's generous.
[–] Volley (3309) a year ago
Under development forever, there probably should have been sequels in the 90s. Expectations may be too high for most. No doubt, people that had their first date at Top Gun will have a reunion date for Maverick, all these decades later. I’d say it gets $450m.
[–] WhereIsRent (961) a year ago
I'd love it to make that much. Sadly it probably won't even make half as much as Jurassic World 3 despite Top Gun most definitely looking like it'll be a much better film.
[–] realbullet1 (90) a year ago
Thinking this will make a billion worldwide is getting your hopes up way too high. I feel this might underperform domestically.
[–] TheArgentinian (3915) 2 months ago
You can't make 1 billion without young audiences and they don't give a fuck about Top Gun
[–] MartyDeniro (2577) 2 months ago
No, it doesn't. Horror is in the lower half at best in popularity and box office. Action, adventure, thriller, and comedy are all bigger genre stars than horror. I don't know if Top Gun will reach 1bil without China
No Cold War level tension + plane designs unchanged in 35 years = flop
posted 3 years ago by ManToTrust (1418)
30 replies | jump to latest
Title says it all.
Everyone is laughing at you. Don’t embarrass yourself any further.
shareSorry bro, it looks like your credibility is...
https://moviechat.org/tt0187078/Gone-in-Sixty-Seconds
that movie hasnt aged well...
shareYou are hilarious.
shareANT-MAN had the benefit of The AVENGERS whereas the Blue Beetle has the benefit of The FLASH: A DCU movie that bombed very hard and that's never good.. We shall see.. Since this movie was made specifically for the Latino Community, it may open higher in areas where they live and not so in other areas
shareNot the kind of benefit I'd want. Kind of foresaw the failure of Blue Beetle.
share