MovieChat Forums > Zone 414 (2021) Discussion > It was actually decent

It was actually decent


Some say it's cheaply done - that's true, at least in regards to the amount of SFX - of which there's a minimal amount. No flying cars in this film.
Many compare it to blade runner - well... there's at least one similarity in that there's also plenty of dusty air in many places. It's dark - no daytime scenes - like in blade runner. Human beings appear to be emotionless, while androids seem to have more emotions than human beings - like in blade runner. Heck, I guess it is quite similar to blade runner in terms of the setting/environment.

Having said that, the story is quite different. Heck, the story here was actually pretty good - the acting was decent as well. The quality of the acting is way above what we saw in blade runner 2049 and the story was superior to the original blade runner, which was too slow for my taste (I won't even bother mentioning the garbage blade runner 2049).

So, in conclusion - while this film had minimal amount of SFX - the acting was great (from the 2 leads) and the story kept me engaged even more so than the original blade runner (blade runner had awesome soundtrack, and great actors - but the story was too slow and quite loose). I recommend people see this film.

reply

Travis was amusing as fuck, hamming it up and chewing the scenery vs Guy's straight man. But Jane is great too, more than capable holding her own against veteran actors like Guy and Travis. Didn't like Royale's acting at all.

You're right tho, the script needed a little bit of doctoring.
The 1st interrrogation scene probably could've been dropped.
Guy figures everything out off-screen w/o doing any investigation. No clues, no hints, nothing.
All those security CAM footage shots didn't lead anywhere, I was expecting a reveal at some point. I guess director thought they added realism? There were just too many not to have an "ah-ha!" moment in 3rd act. Without the reveal, these scenes just break the flow of the plot.

P.S.: Hating on Blade Runner 2049, I see you're a man of culture as well )))
Here's a little smth you might enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZOLKwSsFik

reply

I don't get the hate. It was a little bare bones and abrupt but I thoroughly enjoyed it. Great atmosphere and I had never heard of Matilda Lutz but I really liked her and she's very pretty!

reply

I agree, actually liked it quite a bit. Acting and overall storyline was very good. I likened it to a dark companion/side movie in a Blade-Runner-like universe.

reply

It's not the cheap. I don't mind movies done on the cheap, as plenty of low-budget features turn out great. Weirdly, I don't mind that it's ersatz Blade Runner, either. "There is nothing new under the sun," after all, and this kind of human/robot/AI exploration can be dynamite, if done well.

However, I wasn't a fan of this movie for other reasons.

First, the dialogue. Most of it was perfunctory. There wasn't anything special going on. Travis Fimmel chewed scenery as Marlon, which made his character kind of entertaining (if a little over-the-top) but the writing itself wasn't engaging. His lines aren't (to me) memorable. His character is just "rich guy who builds robots." He wants his daughter back. Okay. Anything else? Other characters are given a similar lack of interesting lines or original backstories. I did like David's backstory and Jane's struggles, but neither were fleshed out over the course of the script. We get David's in a couple of exposition dumps (and all but the pill-purchase is strictly by-the-numbers "gritty P.I." stuff - while I'm nitpicking). Jane's "machine questions identity" isn't original. That's fine, but again, it's not done particularly well.

It's not that they pillaged Blade Runner for their material, it's that they didn't seem to add anything special, new, or unique to those robot bones. The cinematography and music doesn't even feel like they thought about it too hard. They just went, "It looks/sounds like Blade Runner, too," and left it at that (but without the budget to make it work).

The counter-example would be Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang. That films paints by numbers. Its plot skeleton is that of every pulp detective story on the shelf. But what it brings to the table are unique, quirky characters, sparkling dialogue, and a winking homage/send-up of the genre it both is and has fun with.

At the end of Zone 414, my problem isn't that it's bad. That would almost be better. My problem is that it just feels like they did a minimal effort new paint job over top of Blade Runner and called it. It doesn't feel like anybody stayed up late working on this film. It doesn't feel like any of the creative team *loved* it. It's not that I hate the film, it's that I'm apathetic. It's just kinda "there".

I'll close on a positive note. Side characters were just weird enough to be slightly engaging (Royale, e.g.), but it's not enough. Towards the end of the film, one character ponders that God wasn't satisfied with creating until He made death. That's interesting, dark, and a neat insight into the character's motivations and psyche. If there was more of that, the film would have been great.

reply

will check it out

reply