Agreed. This is what The Witch tried to be
What this film did right is that it got a lead with great acting chops. Toni Collette is an underrated veteran actress. Anya Taylor-Joy is a kid, it'll be years before she becomes anywhere near as good as Collette. In psychological horrors you NEED a strong lead performance. Collette hit it out of the park. Taylor-Joy is just a very pretty face
Plus it made you care about the family characters. The Witch handicapped itself with the "time period language" gimmick. It's hard to create sympathetic characters when you can hardly understand what the hell they're saying. The language was a gimmick, plain and simple. Sure, critics will praise it for its "authenticity", but no single movie viewer would rather listen to dialogue that takes work to grasp over dialogue that is easy to grasp
And Hereditary provides much clearer answers. The titular "Witch" is not even a real character, she's more of a plot device. We only see her a couple of times and nothing about her is ever really explained. Again, some critics will defend this kind of lazy storytelling by saying "not everything needs to be spoon fed, it's good to leave some mystery". It's a BS cop out. The Witch could either turn invisible or move really fucking fast, based on how the baby just vanished. She could also shapeshift or cast illusions, judging by how the little boy saw her as a young buxom wench. No limit or consistency to her powers is ever established. In supernatural horror you need to delineate some basic rules, or else it raises the question of why the evil thing doesn't just massacre everyone immediately
reply
share