So if you put a relatively inexperienced 'trained for power and intuitive reaction with speed and focus' against 'point-fighter that knows the precise moves but has no power', it's POSSIBLE that the inexperienced one will win.
Now, winning in a tournament against experienced martial artists that many times, yeah.. it's kind of implausible to say the least.
However, the very LAST kick is actually, as silly as it is, explainable, when you observe it carefully.
Johnny is a bit confused, as his own ethics are at odds with Kreese's brutal, inhuman advice, he also doesn't know what the goal is anymore, now that LaRusso has already been hurt, he has no direction, his thinking is hazy, clouded, filled with uncertainty and opposing ideals. He's not focused.
If you look at him, he is hesitant, unsure, confused, completely 'not in the moment'.
Now compare to Daniel-san, who is in the moment, extremely focused, assessing the situation calmly and effectively, and strikes at the EXACT right moment.
Sometimes it's the FOCUS that wins, being in the moment being the key. Not thinking, yet not dreaming.
Johnny was thinking and dreaming and doing all the wrong things internally, which then resulted him doing the wrong things outwardly as well. Daniel-san was in the zone, he was internally stronger in that moment, so he won.
Sure, it's not all that realistic, but some of it is at least somewhat plausible, when you consider all factors and really think about it.
To add, it IS a movie, after all. Movies are known to be unrealistic in this world..
Those movies are not even close to being AS unrealistic and implausible as all the fema-fascist movies, where tiny, no-muscle, no-training girls EASILY beat up huge crowds of tall, muscular, clearly combat-trained men. EASILY. So if you want to nitpick the 'realism' about who would actually win, maybe go after THOSE movies, first..
reply
share