The Roman Polanski thing is the only thing you mention that even remotely seems offensive, and that was a comment he made, not an action. I don't believe anything Rose says, and Uma is a big girl who could have said no to something she was uncomfortable with. Don't feed me this "position of power" shit. Most of us have bosses,and we would feel right telling them something seemed unsafe. Bitching in hindsight is just that, bitching. It's obvious you don't like him, which doesn't make him a scumbag, you just don't like his personality. I'm sure some people don't like you, but I'll assume you don't consider yourself a scumbag.
reply
share
samoanjoes (56673)
5 years ago
Really? You don't have a problem with Tarantino knowing about Weinstein's actions and doing nothing about it?
You're okay with his blatant plagiarism? You don't believe a guy with a foot fetish would tell a girl that he jerked off to her feet just because you don't believe her for some reason?
Tarantino lied about how safe the car was and she was skeptical. Tarantino even withheld the footage of the car accident unless she signed a document that said she wasn't going to sue. If he did nothing wrong, why not give her the footage of when she asked for it? (Funny how you left that part out) She didn't sign it and he finally gave it to her with an apology after 15 years during the Me Too movement. She was also given the footage after she stated months earlier that she was going to reveal some Hollywood stuff. I guess he got scared and apologized in advance.
How about him freaking out on paparazzi just for filming him walking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxYHxJahzmU
And who cares if they're comments and not actions? If someone goes around calling gay people "fags", black people the "N-word", disabled people "gimps", you're a scumbag. You sound like one of those people that says offensive things and then when they're called out, says "it was just a joke", without realizing how offensive it was.
reply
share
Burk48917 (11360)
5 years ago
You are reaching so far on most of these, I'm not even taking you seriously at this point. Saying "I knew enough..." could mean anything, like overheard rumors. It's far from a confession of full knowledge of all of his actions. I already addressed the others. I get it, you don't like him,even though you don't actually personally know him, still doesn't make him a scumbag. Guess what? I don't like you, does that make you a scumbag?
reply
share
samoanjoes (56673)
5 years ago
He said he knew enough to do something, which means he could have done something about it but didn't. You keep making excuses for him.
The car accident: "Uma could have said 'no' and he apologized 15 years later anyway."
Rose McGowan: "I don't trust her".
Calling out Polanski's rape victim: "who cares? Those are just words."
Busy Phillips accusations: "No comment."
Plagiarism: "No comment."
Paparazzi incident" "No comment".
And again, if you were following along, you would know I never called him a scumbag. The user asked which revelations came out, and I told him about the recent stories.
reply
share