Why the B list cast?
Kind of blasts the message “don’t waste your money, we didn’t”
shareProbably to keep the budget smaller. It still cost $100M I think.
shareBecause we're sick of the A list cast.
shareLOL.
You really like to see those movie stars, don't you?
Ensemble films are better with B list casts as the actors are not detracting from the story. Also an A list start might be able to make the film about them instead of the historical event.
For example, a movie about Billy Fiske was planned with Tom Cruise. Had it been made, we might have been surprised to learn that Tom Cruise won the Battle of Britain by himself. :)
If the actors can act I prefer to see a movie like this without A-listers. When you have an A-lister you know that they on't get killed until at most the last 5 minutes of the movie so there is no tension in anything they do. When you have b-listers you have no clue who will live or die in the movie and that makes it more engaging.
shareCan work with a good script. Dunkirk and 1917 were successes with a relatively unknown cast.
share