MovieChat Forums > Superman (2025) Discussion > Are some superheroes objectively more ri...

Are some superheroes objectively more ridiculous than others?


Not sure if I am biased by the era I grew up in or the comics I read, but it seems to me like certain superheroes are "plausible" while others are laughably ridiculous in live action. I am shocked some of these superheroes are getting included in a genre of movies that was only able to move beyond comic books because it started taking a "realistic" approach to storytelling. I struggle particularly with the Hawkgirl/man characters.

reply

Are some superheroes objectively more ridiculous than others?
posted a day ago by ace2 (597)
17 replies | jump to latest

Not sure if I am biased by the era I grew up in or the comics I read, but it seems to me like certain superheroes are "plausible" while others are laughably ridiculous in live action. I am shocked some of these superheroes are getting included in a genre of movies that was only able to move beyond comic books because it started taking a "realistic" approach to storytelling. I struggle particularly with the Hawkgirl/man characters."


The problem with this movie is unless you're a diehard SUPERMAN fan, then any of the characters featured in this movie are going to come off as an Avengers ripoff and that's from the average moviegoer not an Uber fan of his. We'll see how well this does, but showing SUPERMAN bleeding and battered like Gunn did in the trailer lessens his "Man of Steel" gimmick and makes him out to be just like any normal guy

reply

Though not a super hero, per se, I'd love to see a live action rendition of 'Gumbie', with Madtv's 'Cops' parody, on the big screen.

reply

It's all about how they are handled.

When I used to read comics most of the stories were serious dramas.

Comic universes are chaotic places. The Marvel Universe is "616" which is an alternate version of the number 666 in the Bible. So, the implication is that living in the Marvel Universe is the same as living in hell.

All of this wild and "magical" stuff is going on that is totally out of control compared to what we deal with in reality.

That's why a "dark tone" is good for comics because the situations are horrible, not lightheaded. However, Hollywood has a weird habit of trying to make the stories comical and that makes the characters seem silly.

If you avoid humor and make the stories high stakes you can put of lot of crazy stuff in and make it work.

For instance, when Star Wars came out there was a lot of fantasy stuff in it but it worked due to the drama. Chewbacca looks like a giant dog and is obviously a guy in a costume, but Chewbacca was portrayed as a creature who is always angry and will rip you apart. So, a guy in a giant dog suit was ignored and instead, people were like "OH SHIT! There's Chewbacca!" and that's how you handle the potentially silly aspect of superheroes.

reply

More than tone to me the most important thing is that whatever rules you establish for the character's power, they should be consistently followed. Also everyone else should act logically and respond realistically to the laws of nature.

When aliens or magic is involved I guess anything is possible, but if you have wings made of feathers it irks me that you can fly without flapping them as shown in many versions of Hawkman.

reply

That's a good point.

For someone like Hawkman, showing realistic wing behavior would add to the dramatic effect.

reply

I've always thought Batman was ridiculous. With his money he could become mayor, wipe out corruption and fund the police properly. Instead he puts on a silly plastic bat costume to fight crime, one gangster at a time. It looks like mental illness.

Superman is an extremely powerful alien, which makes more sense for a superhero, even if there's no real conflict to be had.

reply