Confused

Hey now. I'm almost 30 and I still watch Fast & Furious. But I notice a lot of errors in the timeline. Pretty sure that a few years went by between the events of the 6th and 7th movie, so I don't know how in the 8th that Vin Diesel's character can have a son with the woman he was with at the end of 5 and beginning of 6, especially when the son/baby is less than a year old. Unless they SORAS'd Paul Walker's character's son in 7. But even when The Rock was explaining Jason Statham's character's background in 7 and mentioning Statham's brother, it sounded like 3-4 years went by. PLUS Paul Walker's character's son is born at the start of 6, aged a few months when we see the baby next later on in the movie, and then in 7 Paul Walker is taking him to school. The kid is even speaking and walking around and looks to be 4-6 age range.

Also, when I went to see Fast & Furious 8, most of the other people in the theater were my age and older. Definitely quite a few over the age of 50, maybe 60. So it's not teens going to see these movies still. And teens are NOT the ones making up a majority of those watching them.

Yeah you're right. And most of those audience members were ignorant black people in the theater drunk/high and screaming at the movie screen telling the child characters what to do and calling them bitches yet getting scared whenever the doll was shown.
It was the worst movie experience I've ever had. I walked out after the scene where the police are called out to the house.

Seriously? Wow, that's a whole lot of retcon.

Annabelle Higgins is not actually the Higgins REAL daughter, but their adoptive daughter?

This doll that was involved at a crime scene, in which two people were killed, and this doll, that is no longer being used as a conduit anymore, somehow ends up going back into a shop as a rare collector's item when it should be considered to be evidence. I know it's the late 50s, but seriously, for those of you who were from the 1950s or know a lot about how police work was conducted in this time period, did we seriously not take anything like witness statements into account when they say "The doll" had a huge impact on what occurred at the house?

So the demon is possessing Janice. It got what it wanted, and goes into hiding by changing her name to Annabelle. She gets adopted by the Higgins, and grows up into a teenager. Right there is another plot for another movie in this Conjuring universe, a film covering about a decade lifespan from kid to teenager. Hell, it could be called "We Need to Talk About Annabelle". Only difference is, she doesn't kill her parents before the massacre. You probably thinking "The Higgins never mentioned anything about a school massacre", and my response would be "Yeah, but they never mentioned her being adopted neither. So who cares?"

So, after spending twelve years of supposedly doing nothing (until that We Need to Talk About Kevin ripoff film comes out), Janice runs away to join a cult that seeks to summon a demon to claim a soul. Wouldn't Janice just raise her hand and be like "Mission Accomplished. I'm a demon who claimed a soul?" Or did this cult know that and they were trying to seek ANOTHER demon to claim soul?

And how fricking coincidental is it that more than a decade later, when the possessed Janice has her back up against a wall and facing either death penalty or life imprisonment, she's like "Ah f***, I got to do this doll s*** again?! Alright." Slit.