MovieChat Forums > Till (2022) Discussion > Everyone Should See This Extremely Signi...

Everyone Should See This Extremely Significant Film!


Part 1

The 2022 film Till is a biographical drama based on the true story of Mamie Till, played by Danielle Deadwyler, who became an activist pursuing justice after her 14-year-old son, Emmett, was lynched in a racially motivated incident in Money, Mississippi, in August 1955. I had been meaning to watch this for some time and the (now canceled, hopefully temporarily) Black History Month seemed the best time.

The film begins showing Mamie and Emmett’s happy life in Chicago. Emmett, nicknamed “Bo,” is played by Jalyn Hall. The family plans a trip for Emmett to visit relatives in Mississippi and Mamie warns Emmett to be extra careful around all white people. At a train station, Mamie’s uncle, Mose “Preacher” Wright, played by John Douglas Thompson, meets Emmett. When the train crosses the Mason-Dixon line, all the black people have to go to the back.

Emmett joins his cousins picking cotton as sharecroppers, then they go to Money on the evening of August 24. Emmett was told never to leave his cousins, but ventures into Bryant’s Grocery and Meat Market alone. What followed depends on who you believe, but in the movie Emmett tells Carolyn Bryant, a young woman at the cash register, that she looks like a movie star and shows her a photograph of a white woman which came with his new wallet. He buys some candy and leaves the store when his cousin drags him out. He was accused of saying, “Bye, baby” while leaving. In the movie he says, “Bye-bye, bye bye.” Outside the store, he whistled. This probably happened, according to witnesses, although one person said he was whistling at the card game going on outside, not at Carolyn. Carolyn went to her car to retrieve a gun and Emmett and his cousins fled. She appeared to be training a pistol on them as they left.

All is quiet for about three days. Emmett and his cousins do not tell the adults what happened. Then, in the late night of August 27/early morning of August 28, Carolyn’s husband Roy Bryant, played by Sean Michael Weber, and his half-brother John William “J.W.” Milam, played by Eric Whitten, arrive at the Wright home to “teach that boy from Chicago a lesson.”

Emmett’s murder is not shown on camera, but only hinted at from the point of view of Willie Reed, played by Darian Rolle, who witnessed from a distance Emmett with a group of people.

As far as objectionable content, there is a fair amount of smoking, and Emmett’s mutilated corpse, horribly discolored and bloated after being left in a river, is shown in extreme detail as his mother examines it and then displays it at an open casket funeral. The reaction of his mother and other observers are shown, although I’m sure I saw a film of people taking one look, fainting, and having to be dragged off, which was not in the movie. The rest of the movie concerns Mamie Till going to Mississippi for the murder trial of the only two men accused.

A few interesting details in real life and how they were handled in the movie: Emmett’s father, Louis Till, is spoken of as having died in service as if he was killed in action or in some war-related incident. Actually, he and another man were executed for a war crime they may or may not have committed. It’s natural that Mamie would want Emmett to regard his father as a dead war hero and that she wouldn’t speak of him otherwise to anyone else. There was also domestic violence in the relationship which wasn’t mentioned in the movie.

Previous to this I knew several people were involved in Emmett’s murder, but I didn’t know it was possibly as many as fourteen and that some of the participants were black. The number isn’t mentioned in the movie but both black and white people being involved is mentioned. I didn’t know that Medgar Evers and his wife helped Mamie when she went south for the trial.

A conversation takes place between Mamie and “Preacher” Wright indicating that “Preacher” knew Emmett would be killed but didn’t strongly resist his being taken, other than a few verbal pleas. The cousins also tell Emmett that Negroes (the term used throughout the film, except that “colored” is used twice) have been killed for less than what he did. I’m sure that years ago I saw a film where one of the cousins was interviewed and at some point it was said, not necessarily by the cousin but by somebody, that Emmett’s relatives believed the intention of the white men was only to frighten him and nobody expected him to be killed. Someone with more knowledge of the case could perhaps corroborate this.

Carolyn Bryant, whose story signed Emmett’s death warrant, and who was still alive when this film came out, was never arrested or charged with any crime. Many years later she admitted her testimony, given under oath, was largely lies.

reply

Part 2

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences should be ashamed for failing to nominate this excellent film in any category. Danielle Deadwyler gave one of the most remarkable performances, not only in this year, but that has ever been committed to film. Her lack of a nomination was not a “snub” by the Academy, it was an outrageous act of robbery, there is no milder way to put it.

Parents may judge by the subject matter what age of child this is suitable for, but every American should view this riveting film at some time, it is just too significant to ignore.

reply

Did the film mention that his father was executed by the military for raping and murdering a white woman?

reply

No, if you read my review above I specifically say that it was mentioned several times that his father died in service, which would be interpreted only as killed in action or in some war-related accident. Either way, dead war hero. There is even a song which makes it sound this way. He either committed this war crime (I didn't go into its nature) or he was framed for it, either way, executed in disgrace.

Also about Emmett having no siblings, I wonder if his father ever had other kids no one knows about.

reply

He either committed this war crime (I didn't go into its nature) or he was framed for it


One of his fellow black soldiers testified against him, as did one of the surviving victims (it was a home invasion and gang rape of multiple females). It was an open & shut case. His father was a murderous sexual predator who preyed on white women. I wonder why they left that fact out in this film?

Well, the reason why they left it out is because Till was only a kid and already harassing white women who were much older than him. Normal kids that age are asking girls from their class out on dates, not accosting grown ladies in stores. That is deviant behaviour and a huge red flag. If he was like that at 14, what was he going to do when he became a full grown adult?

It's very possible, given his aggressive behaviour towards older women, coupled with his father's horrific crimes, that Till was just another bad seed. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. There's a reason why they cover up his father's past, along with lying that all he did was smile and compliment the woman, when in reality she screamed after he grabbed her and sexually harassed her while they were alone in a store.

reply

Carolyn Bryant herself stated years later, I believe on tape, that she made up the entire part about Emmett grabbing her or touching her in any way. SHE LIED UNDER OATH, COMMITTING PERJURY IN COURT, FOR WHICH SHE WAS NEVER PUNISHED. Emmett never had physical contact with her. He may have said something or displayed some mannerism which set her off, and capped it off by whistling (accounts vary, everything from he whistled to clear up a speech impediment, whistled at the card game taking place, or gave an all-out wolf whistle at Carolyn Bryant. The movie went with the all-out wolf whistle, but left out the detail given in some accounts that some boys other than his cousins dared him to whistle--I don't know whether these boys were ever identified.) If Emmett had any predilection of violent behavior toward females, it was almost certainly heredity only. His mother raised him with love and would never have told a child how his father really died. The movie reflects that, she simply wouldn't have advertised it. I don't know how old Emmett was when the parents split up. There was domestic violence in the relationship he may have witnessed at a young age. He certainly had no motivation to physically accost a stranger and even the accuser later admitted that he did not.

reply