7.1 -- seriously?


How could this have a 7.1 rating? I gave it a 9! Or perhaps just a fan of the small, endearing movies that don't fit the cookie cutter mold?

reply

It's down to 6.8 now. I gave it 8/10. The direction and writing are stronger than the performances, but this is one of Woody Allen's better recent films.

reply

I like many Woody Allen movies but I really didn't like this one. When the ending came I really hated it. Maybe I was just in a bad mood or something but the movie did absolutely nothing for me. I gave it a 5.

reply

7.1 is about right, IMHO..most of Woody's movies in the last 20 years have hovered around the middle-to-above-average range, with some obvious exceptions. I love it any time a new Woody film comes out, and will happily see what he's up to each year, but I don't expect much except a mildly amusing entertainment. Gone are the days of "Crimes and Misdemeanors". His movies these days are rather shrug-your-shoulders amusing and mild - not bad by any means, but definitely not masterpieces.

Please nest your IMDB page, and respond to the correct person -

reply

I agree on the 7-ish.
I gave it an extra star (8) just because of the Vince Giordano on the ST


reply

Agreed. I usually like Woody’s movies, even the newer ones even though not all of them are that great as his old movies. But Café Society I really didn’t like. But I think I mostly had the problem with the casting, and story was not that interesting to me, apart some bits, mainly the ones which didn’t involve the main character.

reply

Underrated for sure; chalk some of that up to people just not wanting to have a movie that doesn't give all the answers, and the rest is probably up to anti-Woody goons.

reply