The Future ... with 20th Century Technology
Brick buildings, crowbars, machineguns, ATV's. Wow! So advanced!
Just like the 20th century, but with space ships.
Where is the science in this Sci-Fi?
Oh yeah, I forgot, it's SyFy.
Brick buildings, crowbars, machineguns, ATV's. Wow! So advanced!
Just like the 20th century, but with space ships.
Where is the science in this Sci-Fi?
Oh yeah, I forgot, it's SyFy.
they had that light healing thing - that's not 20th century.
anyway, if human history has thought us anything, it's that knowledge/science/technology isn't following a straight line. Ancient people used to move and pile enormous rocks, and people today can only speculate on how it was done. Ancient greeks reached levels of advancement that were completely demolished during dark ages, and although we now do have cell phones and computers, some aspects of their society are still out of our reach even today. Right now muslims are wagging wars to bring about sharia law and abandon all knowledge (they call it western knowledge, but it is knowledge in the middle east as much as is here, koran on the other hand is not knowledge being long obsolete peace of fiction). If they are successful in their war, we'll have to say bye bye to our internets and freedom of speech, and new dark age will come, and for all we know, we may never recover from it.
So assuming that future will look flashy is not supported by evidence.
___
Anyone who has ever read any spoilers,
knows that Winter Is Coming
It all comes down to budget, if they dont have the mony for the cg then expect less futuristic and more realistic weapons.
shareI agree. This, and also Dark Matter, are sci-fi on the cheap. It seems like no-one wants to stump up the money for a decent set these days and low budget green screen doesn't cut it either. Same goes for the crappy 20+ year old looking CGI for the space scenes too.
shareIt's not that no one is willing to front the money, its that this and dark matter were made on the cheap (likely to fill a quota for original scripted programming) while SyFy plugged all the cash into The Expanse which is set to air in December.
See trailer below (it doesn't really explain what the story of the show will be...at least when you compare the trailers with what the books story is but look at the sets and visuals it's close to BSG detail)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go2kWWH5sGY
Considering the fact that I'm STILL waiting for the Hoverboard Back To The Future promised me and the flying cars from The Jetsons, I'd say the show's world is much more realistic than whatever you're envisioning
shareGuns were first invented in 1000 CE and we are still using them in 2015 over 1015 yrs laters. In that time people colonized a North and South America, Cars were invented; trains were invented; air planes were invented and spaceships were invented. Yet we still use guns. Stronger and more accurate guns but still guns nonetheless. You know why? They are effective, easy to mass produce and easy to use. They can also be repaired if need be. The resources needed to make and repair them are fairly widespread too.
How easy do you think it is to make a laser gun. Much less find the rare earth minerals necessary to build the components. 90% of rare earths come from China. Suppose that supply runs out from over use. What would people do then.
Colonizing a new planet is not unlike colonizing a new continent. All you really need is a bigger and better ship and a hospitable environment. You don't need a new weapon to accomplish that. History has already proven that just because methods of transportation advance doesn't mean weapons have to.
Shawn: I solve a case every week and usually one around Christmas
We still use guns because the alternative isn't ready just yet, still prototyped. Guns are relatively simple and use a fairly simple chemical reaction for propulsion. Lasers on the other hand are complex and we've only known about them theoretically for just under 100 years and actual work on that theory didn't occur for another few decades in the form of Masers. Then in the 60's onwards lasers. Last year the US Navy deployed a ship (USS Ponce, look it up) with laser weaponry...less than 100 years since theory that of something doesn't exist in nature (unlike the chemical reaction used in bullets) to deployment of a working prototype. The first solid state laser didn't happen until 2000 (or 2001) and in less than 2 decades that tech has been refined to an extent that it's been deployed, in another two decades I won't be surprised if it becomes very common within the military. The manufacture isn't the hard part, the design and creating working prototypes are.
Laser weapon in action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbjXXRfwrHg
The guns in Killjoys are apparently energy weapons, or they fire a projectile in a plasma sheath. That said, as much as I love Continuum it's a good example of why futuretech show guns should be modified versions of modern guns (like the Killjoys' TAR-21 or Beretta 92FS) rather than new constructions. Kiera's Protector pistol and assault rifle both look extremely uncomfortable to use and not particularly ergonomic. Design principles exist for a reason, etc etc.
shareGood points, plus as lasers are shown on TV really aren't an effective tactical weapon.
The whole Star Trek phaser beam has a MAJOR draw back, it gives a way your position. Plus while it would have better range and likely penetrating power, it isn't going to be so superior it counters what would like be a much greater production time and cost.
Plus high tech projection weapons are easy to mass produce, I doubt Phasers/Lasers would be. Back in WW II the Germans had the best tanks going, but they lost to high production models like the Sherman and the T-34 (although the T-34's frontal armor was revolutionary).
I think shows presenting old and new technology come across as a bit more realistic. Plus it saves on production cost, which for SCFI is a huge issue.
In downtown Toronto most of the really desirable housing is Victorian era yellow and orange brick townhouses from 150 years ago and in Europe many buildings are hundreds of years old, or duplicate architecture from centuries ago even though we have vastly improved building materials and methods today. Crowbars are unlikely to be replaced by anything electronic even far in the future since they do the job they are designed for and last practically forever. Portable particle or light weapons are not even close to reality today and likely won't be for a VERY long time unless battery tech increases a thousand fold.
I'm sorry for you that Killjoys doesn't have enough teleportation, Phasers, Sonic Screwdrivers, or FTL travel to convince you that it is the future. I guess we'll just have to make do with talking space ships.
Have you followed the show, at all?
There's a clear divide between the rich & poor, between the powerful & the powerless.
Which to me is clearly shown in the different technologies each party has. The RAC for example has technology that even johnny & carleen didn't thought existed.
On another note, no matter how advanced your weaponry is, melee weapons; such as knifes, katanas & whatnot, will always have a place in combat.
Have you followed the show, at all?Which is all super convenient when you want to make a space science fiction show on the cheap.
There's a clear divide between the rich & poor, between the powerful & the powerless.
Which to me is clearly shown in the different technologies each party has. The RAC for example has technology that even johnny & carleen didn't thought existed.
On another note, no matter how advanced your weaponry is, melee weapons; such as knifes, katanas & whatnot, will always have a place in combat.
I just like to look at Stargate as a good example. You get your futuristic stuff, but nothing's wrong with a good shotgun when facing up to the replicators!
share