Thanks for the civil reply, a rare thing indeed these days. I'll happily respond in kind because I appreciate the discourse, it helps form my own opinion and habits and hopefully those of others who read these things.
Since you seem knowledgeable and eager to respond, maybe you can answer some questions for me that will help me understand. I'm not interested in "Christian baiting" or slamming, I sincerely want to get an educated opinion, something I haven't received in a long time. If you're interested please feel free to respond, if not I don't consider it acquiescing or defeat on either side, certainly, you've made your point and so have I, at this point I'm just interested in details:
1) I respect that people can choose to believe what they want, and those who choose to believe it insist that spiritual matters are as concrete as the earth we walk on...when I want proof of the sun I go outside, when I want to quantify the earth I walk on I use tools to measure it and communicate my findings with others who compare their results. In matters of faith it appears to be more nebulous--even among religious scholars there seems to be a lot of "gray area." I usually offer up the example of Revelations 13:18 (the whole "666" business)--depending on which Bible/translation you study (or which Google page you search) you get a wide variety of responses as to the meaning and origin of that number, or even speculation that the number might be 616, etc. (I'm sure this is old news). It's not like it's a small matter, it's been taken very seriously by large factions. I've spoken to a wide variety of Christians on the subject and the answers I get are all over the place...most of them boil down to, "the specifics aren't important, it's the overall theme that matters, and what I personally believe." Fair enough, but...
2) "homosexuality" is never actually mentioned in the Bible at any point let alone deemed a "sin"...the word didn't even come into existence until the 1800s, and the concept of healthy same sex relations as a lifestyle wasn't recognized at the time the Bible was written; instead, as it continues to be in many countries to this day, homosexuality is considered an "act." The Bible doesn't list specifics about what does and doesn't constitute an official act of perversion, English translations state things like "laying down with a man as if a woman," and the fact that rape comes up in the episode in Sodom suggests sodomy was intended (but it's never explicitly stated)...the overall theme of the Sodom episode is rape is the obscenity, and the same with Leviticus...there's no mention of consensual intimacy between sane adults at all (depending on how you interpret David and Jonathon or Paul of course, but that's another matter)...I haven't yet found anything to support that when I have coffee in the morning in bed with my (legally wed) husband that there's anything "abominable" about it (except maybe his breath)...the question is, where is the line drawn between "I believe this is what it means" and "this is what it says." One person (in this case, without meaning to sound accusatory, but...) claims that "homosexuality is a sin" because that's what he or she chooses to believe, but someone else might interpret the whole thing differently (plenty of people have made cases for and against that hold water). Again, it wouldn't matter so much in matters of sacrificing goats but if you're say, Mathew Sheppard or someone in a nightclub in Florida last summer such semantics matter a great deal, I'm afraid...so do you have an opinion on where the line is or should be drawn? Is it really up to the "individual," even though the Bible was originally written for a specific set of people in charge, and not for individuals in the tribes of Bedouins who couldn't read?
3) You kindly offered that you'd pray for me but I'm curious as to why? If I did something "bad" that needs the assistance, do you somehow think your intervention can help? Isn't that a sin of "pride?" (the whole, "get the sliver out of your own eye first" bit). Furthermore, if I'm "bad" what happens to me? Laws were created by men to control masses of people in a very simple manner (that has gotten more complicated over the years of course). Similarly, if I do something "good," repent or confess or change my wicked ways somehow, what happens then? Many religions don't believe in heaven or hell (Jehovah's Witnesses for one), and I'm always quick to ask what, then, are they so "afraid" of? But assuming heaven and hell exist, for a moment...if I knew my life was going to end tomorrow and I would simply go unconscious and never wake up again I couldn't possibly ask for any more happiness than I've had; to ask for more would be greedy, grasping and pointless. Similarly, if I've done something worthy of having my soul tossed into an eternal fire I certainly wasn't aware of what it was and would make no correlation between what I did and where I ended up, at which point the "punishment" would be too late anyway. "War Room" paints a portrait of a supreme deity as a source of power that can be drawn from and used for personal gain (ie, against attackers or to save a marriage) if you only bow down in humility to it. Do you (personally) believe that praying for something effects change? Again, I'm not asking so I can refute and get into an argument, I'm merely looking for an opinion on the subject. Lastly...
3) Do you personally believe that the message of "War Room" (that rigorous spiritual faith is an effective final solution to personal problems) is a positive one? (I have my own personal opinion on the answer but I have no intention of refuting any response I might get). Do you feel the film is sending out a positive message that is valuable and healthy for people who may not be at a point in their lives that they can make intelligent and rational decisions devoid of passion and emotion? My take, extreme, perhaps, is that films like this do a great deal of damage to people who don't (or don't yet) have the ability to discern for themselves properly, and that using propaganda to push a message (in the place of fair and equal education through comparison and example) is actually shameful. It promotes passive resistance and glorifies lack of education and downplays the value of knowledge gained by studying global history. It preys on working up passions which then turn off intellect. It could be perceived in the same way as films that show women as helpless bimbos who only exist to have sex with the men who desire them or films that perpetuate the notion that African Americans are somehow "less" (and one of the things that actually drew me to the film was that it had a predominantly African American cast but didn't make an issue out of it, a nice sign of the times I choose to think/hope). In a film like this the message isn't presented fairly or equally, which again would be fine if it were being presented as fantasy or fiction, but it isn't. To re-phrase my question, in terms of the original query that drew me to this board...as a non-Christian, these are reasons why I trash the movie...without judging you if you choose to do so, is there a reason you'd defend it?
I think that's about it!
reply
share