Quality engineering: Apollo program too good successful to be true.
The Apollo program had a unbelievable success rate, if you believe NASA's official reports. Officially, they only had one near-catastrophic mission failure (Apollo 13) and a handful of scrubbed missions, most during spaceflight. I know, I know- they had the "Right Stuff" but no space program prior or after could even come near the success rate that the Apollo program claims.
From a quality engineering point-of-view is a impossibility. The link for Wikipeda:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_program
Given the technology, protocols, and process- the program was a fallacy or heavily censored. It's just doesn't make sense. Every other NASA program is riddled full of delays, cancellations, postponed launches, and disasters.
If the Apollo missions were not a hoax, then NASA seriously need to find out what the "Right Stuff" actually was and incorporate it into their current program.