I love Underworld and I am very happy with each installment. I'm sorry that so many people don't like 4 & 5. Personally speaking, I like the they've choosen a different approach. What I like about the series is that it's a straight continuation. These days it's pretty rare to get a horror franchise that goes ahead with the same characters.
5 was better than 4, in my opinion. I liked that they returned to the werewolves vs vampires lore while sticking to the characters of the previous instalment. 4 was an absolute waste of time, it was just absolute filler with no entertainment value.
This is one is much better, but it's still far from being as good as the original trilogy.
5 was better than 4, in my opinion. I liked that they returned to the werewolves vs vampires lore while sticking to the characters of the previous instalment. 4 was an absolute waste of time, it was just absolute filler with no entertainment value.
This is one is much better, but it's still far from being as good as the original trilogy.
I pretty much agree with everything you said. 5 is better than 4 but nowhere near the first 3.
UNDERWORLD 1 - 8.5 out of 10 UNDERWORLD 2 - 9.5 out of 10 UNDERWORLD 3 - 10 out of 10 UNDERWORLD 4 - 3.5 out of 10 UNDERWORLD 5 - 6.5 out of 10
- To me "Underworld: Rise of the Lycans" is the best in the franchise - great fight scenes, loved the setting in medieval Europe (more like old school vampire/werewolf horror movies) and a great cast. I know Selene wasn't in it (except for the last 20 seconds or so) but to me that doesn't matter much as we got the backstory of the whole franchise.