[deleted]


[deleted]


Speak for yourself. Not everyone is racist and an intolerant bigot like you. Many people welcome and encourage diversity.

reply

Blacks in historical is just woke crap and not historically accurate.

reply

Nonsense. They randomly had the husband turn into a homosexual. Gotta have at least one LGBT nowadays

reply

It wasn't explicitly shown he was a homosexual. He didn't feel like having sex then. I have this problem too. Sometimes my dick just won't go hard when I want it to.

reply

No, at the end, at the bar - remember the husband sees a guy and follows him? The implication is that he is gay and they are about to begin a gay relationship. The gayness is the implied reason that he and his wife couldn’t mesh well

reply

I don't really remember, to me he just had a few drinks and that was it. Perhaps I need to see that scene again to see the implied gayness.

reply

That was my immediate assumption when he didn't show any affection towards her. I don't think it was being 'woke' or pushing an agenda. It was more realistic for the time, since it was all implied. And if it matters, the real couple ended up separating (though it wasn't until the 1950s, and don't think they ever had kids).

reply

There was a load of diversity in it: a working-class man, a woman in academia in the 1930s, a disabled woman and a gay man. Not ethnic diversity but lots in other ways.

reply

Well, clearly I meant ethnics. Thank god there wasn't any Negros in this.

reply