I'm sorry, but, as someone else pointed out...
It's HILARIOUS that you are hating on this show for being a rip-off of My Fair Lady when My Fair Lady is a rip-off of Pygmalion.
You're griping that this show isn't 'original' even though My Fair Lady rips off Pygmalion to a T. My Fair Lady = Pygmalion minus the singing. Even the dialogue was nearly 100% ripped from Pygmalion.
If anything, this is much more original because this is a completely re-imagined version of Pygmalion with a modern twist, different dialogue, different setting, etc. SO much looks different here from the original story.
With My Fair Lady, they pretty much took the same exact dialogue from Pygmalion and added songs to it. But, that's what My Fair Lady was -- it was SUPPOSED to be Pygmalion + singing. This, on the other hand, strays from being a carbon copy of Pygmalion.
So, if you're going to gripe about something being 'unoriginal', go to the My Fair Lady boards and complain, because, My Fair Lady was the most un-original re-imagining of a story EVER simply because the dialogue didn't change at all and all they did was basically just add singing and music.
Please note: (before people chew me out) I am not hating on My Fair Lady. Me saying that it's an un-original version of Pygmalion isn't a biased opinion. I am not hating on the musical AT ALL by calling it un-original. It was intended to be un-original. And by un-original, I just mean that the dialogue and everything else was pretty much almost to a T a carbon copy of Pygmalion with some songs added into the mix. I am not insulting the movie, I am merely making an observation and am saying it how it is. Thus, the OP's argument about this show being un-original is actually quite false when My Fair Lady, if anything else, is far more un-original simply because it was made to be so similar to Pygmalion.
reply
share