MovieChat Forums > A Monster Calls (2017) Discussion > Why has this film tanked at the Box Offi...

Why has this film tanked at the Box Office?


I work in a cinema in the UK where the film opened on New Years Day. We thought it would do well (the Critics are raving about how good it is) but most screenings are either completely empty or only have a couple of customers in them. In fact we are getting a few more customers in for 'Assassin's Creed' which opened the same day. This week we put it into our smallest screen and moved 'Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them' back into a larger screen (from the small screen where A.M.C. is now playing). Even though it opened in November, 'Fantastic Beasts' is nearly always completely sold out.

reply

Yeah, just went to Cineworld where they have 3 sizes of cinema (that I've counted so far). this wasn't on the smallest screen but it wasn't on the largest, about 9 people there. I'd put it down to advertising. It looks like a kids film but it isn't so you aren't getting families going but adults are also put off. Such a shame. I walked out of Assassin's Creed. Only ever walked out on a film once before. That's been heavily advertised though.

reply

Assassins creed was awful. Unfortunately I went with 3 children so couldn't leave them in the cinema, especially as they aren't mine lol. I was surprised to see the cinema so empty yesterday for monster, I don't think that it was promoted well though, the trailers make it look like a kids film.

reply

Years ago children's films were darker than they are now. Kids films today are loud and have lots of jokes about farting and butts.

reply

Yes I remember. I do actually think that the kids in my life would love this. However, I think that the idea that it just a kids film is putting the adults off. It's an everyone film.

reply

Saw it today, very good film!! Felt like a kids movie for adults.
There was no one else in the theater though!

There's a hole in the world. Feels like we ought to have known. - Spike

reply

Maybe it will get good word of mouth and claw some money back in rental and sales. At least it isn't a movie relying on money to make a sequel (alas poor Dredd).

There were plenty of 'kids' films growing up in the 80's that even now I think 'how were they even marketed for kids?'. Our generation can handle adult and dark. This generation is too protected. They should play The Plague Dogs in schools and they'd be toughened up lol.

reply

good worth of mouth? Its already closed down, making a measly 3 million--no marketing for the film whatsoever, and I think the Title hurt it

reply

We saw this with our 12 yr old son (same age as Connor) and he loved it. He exclaimed afterwards that 'Disney would never make a film like that!'

reply

Disney owns Pixar and Lucasfilm. Just saying. You might want to teach your child a thing or two. Or just let him keep thinking Disney only makes "innocent" type movies....

reply

Didn't mean to offend anyone's delicate sensibilities, but name me a popular Disney movie with a similar theme and ending!
As for Pixar and Lucas films, what's your point exactly? They are both marketing a certain genre aimed at specific markets.

reply

of course they won't. they rather produce Superheroes with one liner jokes as movies for kids

reply

You sound like a very old person. Pepperidge farm remembers, eh?

reply

This reminds me of the type of kid's film from the 80s, today it's considered too mature I guess.

reply

As for the U.S., the film is bombing (very badly) here because American audiences think it's just "The BFG" with a Groot rip-off instead of a giant old man.



Send her to the snakes!

reply

Accent. That's why it bombed. If the actors were "Americans" then it would have done better. I mean, let's face it. The British accent only works in America when it can be clearly understood. In most cases, it can't. I'm American and I remember seeing the first Harry Potter film in the theatre. I actually fell asleep because I couldn't understand what the kids were saying. Also, making the tree guy look just like Groot doesn't help.

reply

Just saw it last night in America. The theater had three people in it including myself which is not a good sign. Definitely a shame because this is a beautiful film.

reply

I think it's important to remember that movies like this are not meant to be box office smashes... It's a bonus on the rare occasions that they are... But movie studios put them out to show that they're more than just "commercial blockbuster" manufacturers; studios that just put movies together that will shatter records and horde billions. They don't need to make a lot of money. Other blockbusters they put out do all that and then some. They do, however, give us moviegoers looking for real, meaningful movies hope that, despite their economic peril, production companies aren't against making movies that speak from the heart.

------------
Right now, we are alive... And in this moment, I swear... We are infinite.

reply

It seems like it did OK internationally, but it has done quite poor here in the U.S. for few reasons.

1. The material here is a bit of a hard sell. If you were to describe it to someone it sounds like a children's fantasy film, when in reality it's a really heavy drama with pretty dark subject matter that really isn't for children. It just isn't the kind of film that I think mainstream audiences would want to go out of there way to see especially considering how depressing of a film it is.

2. I think doing a limited release around Christmas time followed by a wide release wasn't a really good idea. It's debatable if there was really ever a good time to release this film, but releasing it around Christmas time around an already heavy schedule with movies like Star Wars, La La Land, Fences, and Manchester by the Sea out. Also don't forget that at the time of release Silence, Patriots Day, and Live by Night were also around the indie circuit. And with Hidden Figures going wide the same weekend as well, there was just too much else out there that was much more appealing to audiences. While I'm not sure how much better it would have done, I think it would've performed better in October where it would've faced much less competition.

3. Focus Features really didn't do a whole lot of advertising for this movie. I didn't even see any advertisements for it until the week before it's wide release.

It's a real shame because I saw it last weekend and it's easily one of the best movies of 2016 (In my top 5 for sure) and I really hope it gets nominated for it's visuals and sound design at the Academy Awards and is able to find an audience when it eventually comes out on video.

reply

It tanked because most people don't want to be emotionally manipulated and leave the cinema depressed.

reply

I agree. This was a great film and I tried my best to get more people to see it but it looks like it was a one weekend and done movie because it seems most theaters have dropped it. Much like Kubo and the 2 Strings, it's a mature movie both older kids and adults could really find a lot of worth in. But sadly both got almost zero love from anyone.

Trying to create a channel based on interpreting, reviewing, and even giving you something to laugh about film. Hope you enjoy what you see. Thanks in advance.

Review of the film here-https://youtu.be/ZxZwCR72QvA

reply

[deleted]

what is all this 'limited release' garbage about?

This is only an educated guess as I don't know for certain, but I imagine they did a very limited release over Christmas to ensure it was eligible for the current awards season, then aimed for a proper release in the New Year. Sometime this strategy works (e.g. American Sniper); sometimes - as in this case - it fails miserably.

The domination of Rogue One over the festive season would have made a full release at that time rather difficult. Even the release of a big budget star vehicle like Passengers in competition was considered risky by some.

--
"So I've got bullets, but no gun. That's quite Zen."

reply