MovieChat Forums > Sicario (2015) Discussion > Biggest Female Trope Woman Character Eve...

Biggest Female Trope Woman Character Ever Created In The History Of Film


I'm going to preface this by saying I was in a combat unit for 6 years in the Army. I don't claim to be Special Forces or anything but here is my opinion from someone who has been down range.

This was truly an 8.5 movie turned into a 5.5 movie because the retarded woman that is Emily Blunt playing the most unbelievably naive of roles ever created. She's a 100 lb soaking wet SWAT HRT agent with eyes in the back of her head, she's divorced(I wonder why), and when given the opportunity of a lifetime to work with Delta Force and the CIA in a joint mission(take it from someone who has kind of been there in the military, this is rare and great opportunity as this is the one assignment that define's peoples careers) she is acting like a total puss-cat and threatens to divulge state secrets about how the CIA and Delta does business in Mexico when she agreed to be apart of the operation. I couldn't possibly think of a more annoying character, I think she treats her partner like crap considering how loyal he is to her, her "loyalty" to him is pretty evidently not as strong.



Women should be madder than anyone from seeing this film. She's supposed to be a hardcore HRT agent, I've met one before he was 200 lbs of solid muscle and his neck was bigger than Triple H, yet she throws up and has a damn near heart attack when she goes through a house and finds dead bodies. Really? HRT is world class and trains with the British and Australian SAS, Navy SEALs, Delta, and a host of international other forces to become some of the best trained people out there, and she couldn't even fill the boots of local tactical unit based on her performance. This movie in almost pathetic in how it portrays women. There are some badass women who could have totally owned the role, as ridiculous as it is, but they picked someone who can't act and then wrote her to be a trope. Whoever is responsible for writing her character should be thrown off the Empire State Building and never allowed in HollyWood again.




To be clear. I don't have a problem with her being 100lbs and an HRT leader. That's unrealistic, but whatever it's HollyWood, I can get over that. What I can't get over is her attitude, personality, and bearing is completely unlike that of a FBI HRT new guy, much less a team leader(think a team leader leads multiple men, into battle, these people are inspiring and almost scary at how much confidence and knowledge they posses) her character would not have got that promotion in any field office based off the above mentioned characteristics. Her bearing is more than an FBI human resources analyst with a couple courses at the range, compared to a hardened FBI HRT team leader, most of which have special operations military experience, and then another 5+ years as a cop(usually on a tactical unit before applying to the FBI and then going through another rigorous process just to become a team member)

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2013/february/hostage-rescue-team-the-crucible-of-selection

reply

crickets

reply

How did this "Mary Sue" crap get so popular? It's pretty f'in stupid.

reply

Same as the terms "hipster" and "edgie."

People see a term on-line and run with it. It has gotten to be pretty stupid.

IMDB as a whole is sinking fast....

reply

I've never used "hipster" and I don't even know what an "edgie" is. Maybe it's not my generation?

reply

It is and has been a movie/TV/literature trope for quite
a while and like many others (Chekov's gun for example*) has become popular as more and more people learn the many script actions that have become quite standardized.
There is a specific trope internet site but I am forgetting it's name.

*C.g.: If a gun is shown/acknowledged by the end of the first act, it WILL be used before the end! (translation: Good writers do not emphasize stuff that does not advance/create expectations for the story. Readers/watchers do not like that!!!! Makes them uncomfortable. Tropes make for comfort
if it isn't funny enough have someone hit in the face with a fish. Since Thorne Smith likes it ...

reply

I agree , I noticed that her body shape doesn't look strong. Also her attitude with her partner.

reply

Which is a bit weird, because she was much tougher and stronger in edge of tomorrow

reply

Frankly, one of the things I liked about the movie was that the girl didn't miraculously develop the abilities of a Delta Force operator and prove that she was their equal or better as a warrior. That would be the real "Mary-Sue."

Also, I assumed she (and virtually everyone else) was throwing up because of the stench of dozens of rotting bodies that had suddenly been released in highly concentrated form from behind the sheetrock where it had been building up for weeks or months in Arizona, one of the hottest climates in the U.S. For her part, she seemed much less affected than her partner and the many other team members out retching in the yard. So why didn't the bosses react the same way? Perhaps it was because the concentration had had time to clear some when they got there. I also think that the scene of these hardened, experienced FBI agents reacting this way was meant to indicate that the evil nature of the enemy they faced was several levels of magnitude beyond anything they had ever experienced.

Obviously her character doesn't have the value system the OP expects of someone in her position (values I'm not here to condemn). Instead, as a law enforcement officer, she was wary of violating multiple laws, international agreements, etc. She is also trained far differently from CIA agents and military special forces, who exist to bend, tweak, and shatter rules.

Instead, she's looking to gather evidence for court cases, as she was trained to do, and balking at doing things that ran counter to that goal. The operators and her superiors constantly correct her and offer justifications, but in the end there's no getting around the fact that they were violating the laws and aiding the horrifcally violent Colombian Medellin Cartel to regain hegemony in the drug trade because the powers that be viewed Medellin as the lesser of two evils. Of course, this is the cartel built by Pablo Escobar, a criminal so depraved that he blew up a jetliner with over a hundred passengers aboard in order to kill a single politician, and Escobar used his own lawyer as the unwitting carrier of the bomb. Eventually, the same U.S. operatives as those portrayed in this film -- Delta Force -- helped the Colombians assassinate Escobar, later posing triumphantly over his body like that dentist with his lion.

Americans have always accepted the occasional transgression in what we've regarded as extraordinary circumstances. However, before 9/11 and the policy directives that followed, we could at least pretend to be outraged when an enemy displayed a captive American who had obviously been beaten or tortured, and we could readily claim that we never shot in the back or sucker-punched anyone. Of course that was always bull, but now we don't even get to pretend it isn't because we openly embrace tactics and policies that would have been unthinkable for the majority of our existence.

So, maybe she was portrayed unrealistically. I doubt her behavior was as unlikely as the OP proposes, but I'm not in a position to say for certain. Nevertheless, I would argue at the very least that she was the avatar for those of us who don't agree that the end always justifies the means. Isn't this the same argument someone has Jack Nicholson make in A Few Good Men, that some of us "can't handle the truth?" I agree that things are never black and white, but there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, or we're no better than those we call enemies and criminals.

For my part, I was glad that the script had Alejandro kill the wife and children. Anything else would have rung false to who he was and what this conflict represented. The movie allows all of us to validate our beliefs, whatever they are. Some will see it as a lesson in the reality we face today, and others will use it as an example of the lawlessness and hypocrisy of our government. For my part, I can't say I think the movie promotes one side or another, but like most good art is just lays out what the question really is. Hopefully, the best of us will use it in just that way, to question who we are and what we are doing, whatever answers we may ultimately draw from it.

reply

Very good post (imdb should have the possibility for upvoting)

reply

I agree, I like the fact that she wasn't the cliched Amazon warrior. She bumped her head, got beaten down by two guys, is not an A-type personality, doesn't have a chip on her shoulder, and yet was a competent, morally good character who happened to be used. It was refreshing to see women acting as...women sometimes.

reply

[deleted]

Exactly This!

reply

What you are describing is 100% correct. She's completely unbelievable as a battle hardened tactical agent.

Her character is written out to be a mental invalid.

By the way, that is not a "Mary Sue" character. You need to look that up. Mary Sue means someone that is perfect at everything they do. Her character is exactly the opposite.

reply

A good example from a recent movie is Rey from The Force Awakens. It's like Abrams got a memo "make a strong female character" and proceeded to give Rey every skill known in the SW universe.

reply

[deleted]

She wasn't HRT or even SWAT, but neither has that much to do with body weight. FBI has one HRT (divided into two sub-teams) and they're all in Quantico. They have about six regional SWATs for whom the gig is full-time or nearly so (they're probably all hoping to be HRT someday I imagine). Past that, the FBI has office-SWAT-teams for the lower-risk ops, but for those teams the SWAT gig is an extra duty and they're still working cases, or intel, or whatever their "day-job" is. In any case she didn't seem to be on the office SWAT team either. Her gear and patches were different and she was introduced several times as being on the kidnapping task force, which was a real interagency thing put together in the Phoenix area in response to multiple, ostensibly-drug-related and often-unreported kidnappings. One of the probably-unrealistic facets of the opening scene was the apparent dynamic of the investigative case officer(s) making entry WITH the SWAT; usually, a case officer would wait on their crime scene to be secured by the tactical team, rather than tag along as part of the entry. This intentional "mistake" was made even more blatantly on multiple shows, from Law & Order (they went in right behind ESU at least once a month) to one of the darkest detective shows I've ever seen: Se7en ("SWAT goes before Diks!" - they should have tripped him as he ran past).

I think I noted a couple other posts explaining theories on the lead character: one "normal" cops who's getting jaded by all she's seen but then experiences a radical metric shift she can barely process as right or wrong before moving to the next op. They stuck in the bank scene to show she's a conventional cop at heart, which helped explain a little how confused and frustrated the "average" cop may get.

Oh, yeah, I don't think it's "Delta Force" which I think may've been a nickname perpetuated by a another movie (that one I didn't see, so I could be wrong). I think Delta is the alphabetical designation of the Special Forces Detachment with the counter-terrorism & hostage rescue duties, though I think even those designations may've changed a little as the special operations communities have re-organized or merged in some ways. Good post though, thank you for the good read.

reply

Don't use terms you have no understanding of.

➖➖
Closure is a made up thing by Steven Spielberg to sell movie tickets.

reply

Nope. That girl from the latest Star Wars who can use the force better than anyone in just one film is one.

Want three steaks?... My mistake. Four steaks. 

reply