MovieChat Forums > Honeymoon (2014) Discussion > Lazy Endings (Spoilers)

Lazy Endings (Spoilers)


Movies seem to be getting more and more lazy. Lets make an alien movie, but lets not have any reasoning or explanation, but we can hide behind the now cliche "do you need the ending spelled out for you"? Yes.. Perhaps I do. Perhaps I want to know what was really going on and why. If I wanted to have to "interpret the ending", why watch the movie in the first place? I could just sit at home and make up my own stories. And the writers and directors don't have to defend it. A legion of self-rightous ego fans will run in, screaming how stupid you are for needing an actual ending.

I don't mind some well played ambigious endings. Total Recall (90's version) was interesting because you really didn't know if it was all a dream or not. That's interesting and well played. But recently there simply seems no more payoffs, just sad, abrupt stops in the story for no other reason than to look cool. I'm a hip director with a hip movie cause my ending was wide open and everyone can guess how it actually ended. Really?

So on this movie, again, no payoff. No reasons, no ideas, no real understanding of what the heck was going on. It just stopped. And if anyone questions that, well, apparently they are all dumb and ignorant and not cool.

reply

I blame the Blair Witch project.

reply

Perhaps Blair Witch Project did start a downward trend.

reply

My sentiments exactly. I really liked this movie until it did this. I watch a LOT of horror films, and this whole "open for interpretation or do you need it spelled out for you" ending may have been novel a few times, but this is freaking ridiclous and this isn't creative or new. At this point it is a freaking cop out. It is right up there with "it was all a dream/person or persons are crazy and none of it ever happened/people didn't really exist" BS. Lazy and ridiculous.

reply

the Blair Witch is a horror masterpiece.

reply

Yes I enjoyed the first Blair witch I am not sure about other shaky cam stuff.

reply

Thank you for expressing this so perfectly, I whole heartedly agree, and it is so frustrating. The way this movie ended basically said to me - "we were too lazy to finish the story and/or couldn't come up with anything good, so you'll have to make up your own ending". It isn't artistic in the least, it's a cop-out. For sure there are some movies where the ambiguous endings really work, but that's because they were done in a thoughtful way, and wasn't because the writers got lazy.
It really leaves a sour taste in my mouth. If I wanted to make up my own story, I'd be doing that, not sitting here watching the film.

reply

I agree with the OP. The basic rule of storytelling (everybody should know this because is thought in school) is introduction - problem - climax - resolution or solution of problem.

The scriptwriters nowdays seem to have forgotten this.


"Imagination is more important than knowledge" ALBERT EINSTEIN

reply

Good formula to follow if you want to write a basic story. There was no solution to their problem. It's a tragic horror story. They were doomed. For the effect that was intended the ending was spot on.

https://werewolfvsunicorns.wordpress.com/

reply

You and everyone who agrees with you are wrong and dumb.

https://werewolfvsunicorns.wordpress.com/

reply

I agree about lazy ambiguity in general in recent movies, the only way I think this movie gets away with it a little is through its cyclical / tiered depiction of humans senselessly hurting animals (who are senseless to the reasons), with the humans in turn being hurt by the aliens in a senseless fashion - I assume the director is trying to put the audience in the same position as the characters, including the animals, and perhaps even the alien females (at the end they seem more like automatons than characters, as if the bodies are just vessels by the time they're taken over). Yadda yadda . . .

reply

you didn't understand the film at all, then you knock it?

reply

Okay, I will spell it out for you:

Aliens are experimenting on two women. The alterations are slowly eating their minds away. Ultimately "they" will be gone and replaced ala BODY SNATCHERS. Their husbands cannot understand what is happening until it is too late, and die as a result.

The film can be taken literally, whereupon it is a classic alien abduction story. The end is not ambiguous, as it is obvious that the husband is dead and the wife is being abducted by the aliens.

The film can be taken as an allegory for someone close slowly succumbing to mental illness, or as another poster put it, how pregnancy can change a relationship. The aliens are a macguffin, in that it is really about the breakdown of a relationship (ie what would you do if your wife was slowly losing her mind?).

This is not to say that you have to like the movie (I thought it was well made and alright.. it just needed a few more creepy/scary scenes), but it really isn't that hard to comprehend.

reply

Mate... the sanctity of their relationship was traumatically violated and the film deals with the affects this has on them both as a couple and as individuals. Don't get hung up on the plot device of ET rape (if that is indeed what "happens" in the film).

"Find out what to think next!"
-Chris Morris, "Brasseye"

reply

I'm certainly not commenting on how you had to perceive the film, or how you're supposed to feel about it, but I'm totally missing how the movie is even a little ambiguous.

The director gave you a big, giant clue 20 minutes in as to what was going on, and I thought the story flowed naturally from there. Nothing felt odd or out of place, and I think it told the story it set out to tell, including its resolution. We've seen and heard so many alien abduction stories over the years, it's not hard to imagine where it went once it was finished telling its core story.

But what happened next really wasn't the point. This was a closed story about two people, and the individual effects this one encounter had on the both of them as a couple, and individually as people. In fact, I'd argue the story was really more about Paul, and that the ending felt so abrupt because Paul's story had reached its conclusion (also abruptly, but appropriately).

I really loved the movie. You could make a case that it was an allegory about multiple things, but I think the film was literal. They wanted the women, it was clear why they wanted the women, and the men were dealt with. The end.

reply

it was clear why they wanted the women,


was it? it was not clear to me at all. please could you tell me why the aliens/demons wanted the women.

i feel that the hour and a half was not well utilized - too much of paul acknowledging that his wife was altered her saying i am fine, and then some half baked exposition in the last ten minutes.

this film was just poor. i wasn't scared, or unnerved, or intrigued. i just felt that i had wasted 90 minutes that i won't be getting back.


reply