Something very ridiculous about this movie, and nobody's talking about i

"This movie is for 10-year-olds" is exactly correct. It's made for teenagers who go on dates with their teenage lovers to the theater and, since they've never seen any good thought-provoking films, or more importantly: READ anything good and though-provoking, they leave the theater under the impression that they've seen something good, but obviously it's "good" only in the mind of a teenager. The production quality is good, the acting is good (except for Jesse Eisenberg), but they've shined sh*t and called it gold, and the biggest demographic of people who frequent these dumbed-down, pg-13 popcorn date movies are teenagers. If you had to be 21 or older to watch this film, its IMDB rating would be lower than 4/10. A good example would be Breaking Bad. It's a good show don't get me wrong, but there's no way in hell it deserves the rating of (last time I looked 9.4/10), which was higher than game of thrones, sopranos, the wire, deadwood, dexter, etc. And the bottom line is that it's not even close to shows of that caliber (i.e. stuff on HBO, showtime, etc). But the fact of the matter is that teenagers who only have access to cable television are only able to see stuff like the walking dead, lost, heroes, etc, and they come to IMDB and say "I R LIKE ZOMBIES, WALKING DED IS 10/10 SHOW, I LUV TEH ZOMBIZ"... except the aforementioned shows, when considering everything else, are more like 7/10 shows. It's like a person who's never seen or driven a porsche, ferrari, lamborghini, etc and has only driven honda civics and mustangs their entire lives then they review the latest subaru WRX on their youtube channel talking about how it's a 10/10 when they've only experienced the tip of the iceberg, and quite frankly don't have access to, and will most likely never get to experience the other 90% of the iceberg

Second of all my current take is that the chip was a hoax/play to begin with.

There are some partial and narrow band vunerabilities to RSA encryption, especially when it comes to badly schemed random number generation. Side channel attacks using branch prediction analysis was show to discover 508 out of 512 bits in just 10 iterations, many suspecting fully cracked but that line of reseatch and the guys coding dissappeared pretty abruptly, most figure they were bought out. Another interesting and actually movie friendly possibility is the power fault attack, which would involve access to power system the key server was running on and amplifying the cpu voltage outside of specified limits, here's a pretty interesting pdf on it (http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DATE10RSA.pdf)

But I think this is well beyond the scope of a imdb discussion haha





- Currently watch classic Cinema like Gods of Egypt

It did, but everything that can be said was already said by someone else. I wanted to address one issue nobody had talked about.

Yeah, the mind control is *beep* Even more, I think that power is really underused.

But as I said in other comment, what I wanted here was to talk about an issue nobody had mentioned before.

Thank you..I was starting to think no one even watched the movie..The chip was not real people..It was the EYE that made the dad and son think that it was real, and yes the guy that was in the place where the chip was stored was part of the EYE....

Yes, I did see the movie. Yes, I understand The Eye set all this up. What I don't understand is how Daniel Radcliffe, who is supposedly a technology expert and not part of The Eye, fell for such a device without questioning how it could actually work.