Figuring out how some tricks were done, since this movie do not have CGI
The majority of the tricks i figured out, the only one now is how lex turn into water in the floor... how they done it?
shareOP misspelled logic as CGI
--
A picture with a smile - and perhaps, a tear.
They try to explain some of the tricks but it is stupid and impossible anyway.
Mark Zuckemberg dissappearing into water was not even explained, it's like they just said "ah *beep* it, who cares"
I'm the guy who makes the "worst movie ever" thread in your favorite movie board
CyberVerm wrote:
> They try to explain some of the tricks
> but it is stupid and impossible anyway.
EXACTLY!... They TRY to explain, but the explanation is just stupid.
For example (and just one example), the trick with the plane at the end... Only fans and rain do not give anyone the flight sensation. It is also necessary to simulate the effect of the forces of gravity on the body, especially during the take off. People inside the false plane would notice the lack of these forces.
Just like being in a car simulator, you will not find the experience real if you do not have the effect of gravity throwing your body to and fro, according to the curves.
And HOW they move all the plane to the Thames' waters, without notice?
The show the stage of the plane at end, it is sitting of some sort of hydraulics.
Ever sat on a fake ride? It really gives you the g forces in the stomach.
Also, the bad guys where not watching out of the window, nor where they paying attention to gravitational details.
Yes, "The Eye" has unlimited resources (since its supposedly going back to the first tricksters in Egyptian times), so money and manpower is not a problem.
The problem with this is: the sheer preparation for such a stunt is MONTH not 24h. Also building and programming of a 1:1 copy plane takes weeks to make it right.
Alone for the "trick" with strobe lights and water, takes like weeks to setup correctly at that place. They had to have all the tricks and people trained month it advance, in London, just for the sheer possibility to do this plot.