I now understand the pro-abortion/pro-choi ce stance

bluesdoctor, perfectly coherently explained every nuance.
That first paragraph in particular nailed it & I believe reveals somewhat where the problem & misunderstanding between (what is certainly ANGRY/passionate) opposing sides is born: asserting they each have answers neither truly does. That is the fact...that no one knows for certain. You are correct there.
Which, in my estimation, makes it far more imperative to exercise caution, prudence & if able to seek this out, as end objective, good moral judgement.

Arete-1.
You could NOT have been more pompous, arrogant & insulting in pontificating your outrageously incompetent thread.
To me, almost bordering on amusement--this overwhelming seething level of condescension. So palpable, you must choke on it every morning.
With every syllable you crank out, you demonstrate further your own inflated ego & flawed opinion of yourself. So you think you are more educated & intelligent than those that oppose you? Well, no, sadly, you are not. Not even close.
And appears to be your aim to be as offensive & insulting as can be to (all I can intimate)intimidate those who do not agree with you.
Fact is, I'm sure I could rip out your foundation, AND your baseless argument to shreds if I felt the urge. I honestly am confident I hold keen appraisal of your skill, just given your verbose but mistaken missive here that acts as ammunition to triumph in such debate. But what's the point on wasting time on such a worthless cretin. Plus also there's the risk I'd surely then appear as boastful, proud & intolerant as you are (jackass) which that alone, would be a total horror to learn. Thankfully, we have nothing in common.
Again, very annoyed by your deluded self-estimation where I think I judge things, myself included, rationally. Since you care to throw stones at others, I will let you know that I know I'm smart. I have the documentation & success to prove it. I also am smart enough to know that there are others far smarter than I. Just not YOU, dude.
I truly surmise you find yourself seriously compelling as you insult & spew your hateful venom. Ah......if not to hide behind your keyboard in utter anonymity (while you attack your opposition!), NOW that is the DREAM! I see you this sad, angry, impotent & useless tiny man.

I see the future, where they will have options to transfer the fertilized egg to another woman - if wished. Or, if you want to get really scifi, they just put it in an artificial womb.

I can already see how "they" will try to use some "made up" reasons why the woman has no right to get rid of their fertilized embryo this way.

Its all about that women should marry and not having sex. Its about control, nasty style. If the kid starves to death because the woman is, for example, a careless drug addict, they couldn't care less about the dead child.

You will find lots of those "ethical" post birth examples thrown out of the window by constructing some sort of "universal parental responsibility" - when lots of the animal population gives up their newborns (to die) for lots of reasons. Since humans are nothing more than better animals, the natures law doesn't change just because you say so.

Nobody is really "pro-abortion". In many countries the safety net is so strong, that lots of women doesn't even think about that and abortion rates are at a all time minimum. You would argue, that creating a strong social net (for women) could create insane drop rates in abortions.

If they wanted this kind of paradise, they would argue about it. But they wont. Because its, again, about control of those "sluts". All the other arguments are just religious colored smoke and mirrors.