Completely unnecessary anal sex scenes

uh, your children shouldn't be watching r rated movies if you can't let them watch an anal sex scene that actually never happens but is just talked about.

Oh I say! If you had paid close attention, Mr. Neeraj, you would have realized there were NO anal sex scenes. There was only the mention of anal sex. That's quite a difference. However
I also found that a bit distasteful, the only thing I didn't like about this film.

Other than that I thought it was bloody marvelous!







Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.

You have to prevent your children from watching because of a reference to sex but you have no problem with the violence?

Surely you're joking. Killing animals(despite what they found out after the fact), violent killing scenes set in a church albeit supremacist one, heads exploding and a baby being violently pursued to be killed isn't a deterrent for keeping this from your children but consensual anal sex is deal breaker. How utterly ridiculous.

Daddy! He's killed Steve and he's jamming the door with him!

[deleted]

Do you also prevent your children from watching Moonraker? You know the Bond film which ends with Q blurting out "I think he's attempting re-entry" whilst Sir Roger winks at the camera.

That's obviously what they were trying to out do, with the joke being the crassness of how far they had to go to go beyond what was in a family movie in the 70s...

There is no such thing as an unnecessary anal sex scene..

Good thing she wasn't a real princess. The only princesses that normally do that are usually Hollywood and porn industry "royalty," rather than real blue-blooded princesses.