MovieChat Forums > Sinister 2 (2015) Discussion > Do I need to see Sinister (1) before I c...

Do I need to see Sinister (1) before I catch this one?


Do I need to see Sinister (1) before I catch this one or can I skip it?

Thank you!

reply

Yes, you need to see the first film. This one probably won't make any sense if you don't.

Plus, at least 9 out of 10 people who see both will tell you the first one is the better film.

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

reply

Ive watched alot of horror movies,underground ones.and sinister original parts of it thoroughly creeped me out..

reply

Glad I'm not the only one lol. I'm a horror movie fan and Sinister 1 really got me. Started to watch it again one night but it was too creepy!

reply

I would recommend that you do so that you get a deeper sense of the build up for part 2, but this film isn't too bad by itself. You will miss the impact and significance of a few scenes and references but...it wouldn't be completely confusing if you saw it alone.

reply

I kind of beg to differ. I would have been lost regarding who the Oswalt family is or Bughuul, the idea behind moving houses and back, etc.

Plus, the first one really does dig deeper into the mystery. If you see the first one afterward, there is zero mystery surrounding any of it.

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

reply

I kind of beg to differ. I would have been lost regarding who the Oswalt family is or Bughuul, the idea behind moving houses and back, etc.

All that backstory was explained in S2 during the scene between the professor and the detective.

reply

Exposition is not the same thing as imagery or first-hand experience. I know they were explained away, but as I said I would have been lost with it. Not that I couldn't piece things together, but I would not have painted the same portrait on the canvas as Scott Derrickson did for S1.

Not to mention... the first one is better anyway. No reason not to see it first.

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

reply

I would just because it's one of the better recent horror films.

reply

why wouldnt you watch the first one???????






i've got feelings too, ya know - inbetweeners

reply

Yes, they really assume from the very beginning that you know the first film.

reply

My advice would be instead of.....

reply

[deleted]

YES!! I think you really should catch the first one before you see this one. One of the main characters from the first film also appears in this one, and they make many references to characters and events from the first film.
I actually wished I had re-watched sinister before seeing number 2, I had first seen it when it was at the cinema and hadn't watched it since and so I couldn't really remember who was who or how it ended. I could still enjoy Sinister 2 as it does have its own individual storyline, and is entertaining on its own, but I was getting a tad confused every time they talked about something concerning sinister 1
:)

reply

I recommend watching the first film and then just skipping this one altogether.

reply

Definitely. Unless the OP loves lame jump scares.

reply

Definitely. Unless the OP loves lame jump scares.

I saw no S2 jump scares as lame as the scorpion and snake. None as lame as the "night terror" red-herring scares. And none as pointless as ghosts popping up only to scare the audience and not the characters within the movie.

reply