Oscar?
It pis$es me off this man has never won an oscar.
His films are beloved by millions. And the only people who win are no-names always walk home with the gold.
It pis$es me off this man has never won an oscar.
His films are beloved by millions. And the only people who win are no-names always walk home with the gold.
[deleted]
Wow, really?
share
Maybe the Oscars are rigged.....
The Oscars isn't a popularity contest, you dork. Why would he win an Oscar?
shareBecause, he is this generations Mel Brooks, Spike Lee and Francis Ford Coppela rolled into one perfect filmmaker.
shareBUAHAHAHAHAHA! You can't be serious! He's a terrible filmmaker. This movie in particular: the camera work and editing was lazy, there were unfinished subplots, the writing was terrible, the plot was flat and his personal ignorance was clear. A little boy in a small farming town wouldn't get bullied for being a farm boy. And the KKK doesn't meet in public like that or in their robes. For a southern man he has no concept of Southern dialect. I heard Georgia accents, Louisiana accents, Carolina accents, etc. The school looked like he filmed it in a law firm. This guy with a science degree was tinkering around with open chemicals in a barn without protective gear. He can make people laugh, but he can't make an Oscar worthy film. He fails at the basics. And the blocking was so bad. There's nothing Oscar worthy about Tyler Perry. The closest thing was Precious, and all he did was throw in some money for marketing.
shareHis films are beloved by millions.
Maybe his films are not perfect in every way. Techicall flaws can be over looked when you are dealing with a master of storytelling. His humuor, the knetic energy he brings to every shot. The charisma he brings on screen is undenyable. HE is like a black Woody Allen. Critics may hate his work now. But heed these words.
Future film books will bare his name. Kubrick, Bermgan, Fellini, spike Lee, and Tyler Perry. All mavericks who have been misunderstood and under appreciated at times.
I kind of love you.
shareThanks, Sweatercannons. It nice to know I am not the only film lover who understands what Sir. Tyler Perry is doing. Few filmmakers are as fearless to go as bold as him. He paints his screen with bold strokes. I would put him on a visual level with a Picasso, Only TP has a sense of humour...and is hilarious dressed as a woman.
shareYes. He will be taught in film classes when they learn what NOT to do. He couldn't craft a story if it came in a discount child's kit with directions.
shareCouldn't agree more! His plots are riviting!! Anyways I think crictics are getting paid off to DESTROY this talented mans career.. His talent is undeniable and all his movies have UNDENIABLE laugh out loud moments! =)
Glad theres some ppl who actually get him!
The movie was amasing and I definitely think he should get either best director, or best actor =)
[deleted]
Hitchcock did win The Irving Thalberg award, which is quite an honor and his "Rebecca" did win best picture, although for David O Selznick. Altogether Hitch's films were nominated for 50 academy awards, including 6 of them for Best Picture, I believe. Oddly enough, Hitch, who many consider THE master filmmaker of all time, never felt compelled to entitle ANY of his films "Alfred Hitchcock,'s Rear Window, or "Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho".
Tyler Perry, although evidently have a grand old time playing dress up, should get a clue.
Tyler Perry is comparable to Uwe Boll and Ulli Lommel.
share