MovieChat Forums > The Survivalist (2016) Discussion > Penis wanking scene

Penis wanking scene

posted 9 years ago by omendata
30 replies | jump to latest

I must admit i found that a bit unneccessary - did anyone else not find that rather disturbing.

Milking himself into the soil - spreading the seed so to speak - rather graphic and a bit seedy if you pardon the pun.

Utterly soul destroying movie with a few bits of seedy sex thrown in.
If you were on the verge of suicide this one would put you completely over the edge.

You have to laugh at the artsy fartsy brigade giving it the soulful meaning and deep introspective hogwash - Dont watch this movie its utterly soul-less and mind numbing slow and boring with absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever unless you are into watching old ladies beaver and a guy wanking himself into a pot - I mean what in gods name was that thrown into the mix for i have no idea - needless to say one of the artsy fartsy brigade will chime in with a seed and life didactic.

Im away to slit my wrists now....Goodbye cruel world!!!!

[–] tobias_kl 9 years ago

Yeah this scene was unnecessary.

[–] therefdotcom 9 years ago

it was unneccessary. the film tried too hard to be somewhat devastating. (spoiler) the unneccessary nudity, the lame "twist" the, poisoning, the cannibalism ...etc. there were some good elements in it, for example the way they told the story without hardly any dialogue, but it seems like they ran out of ideas half way through.

"You have to laugh at the artsy fartsy brigade giving it the soulful meaning and deep introspective hogwash"

i gotta admit that i had to laugh occasionally. when the old women told the guy "she likes" you, i was in stitches. the rest was beyond the end, when the film turned quickly from bearable to crap.

"needless to say one of the artsy fartsy brigade will chime in with a seed and life didactic. "

oh, i am part of that crowd. nevertheless, this one left me unimpressed.

[–] hughwm 9 years ago

I think the scene was included to show just how lonely and desperate he was. I suppose it was necessary to show why he was so willing to invite the two women into his shack. I agree it wasn't really necessary to show it THAT graphically.

[–] therefdotcom 9 years ago

"I think the scene was included to show just how lonely and desperate he was. I suppose it was necessary to show why he was so willing to invite the two women into his shack."

agreed, also he used his cum a fertilizer, BUT...

"I agree it wasn't really necessary to show it THAT graphically. "

exactly! why show a multiple minutes long closeup of his pecker?

[–] hughwm 9 years ago

The scene also shows that porn is in short supply after the apocalypse. If the old woman had had a few copies of the Grattan catalogue or even some old National Geographics with African tribeswomen pictures, they would have been worth a whole field of brassicas!

[–] therefdotcom 9 years ago

hahaha. so true. wanking off to the pic of a fully dressed random chick, looking weird into the camera is a tough cookie. didn't he have any imagination that he could draw from?

[–] hughwm 9 years ago

The impression I got was that he wanted to feel, at least in some tiny way, a connection with a real person; someone's wife or sweetheart, even if she was probably long dead.

[–] omendata 9 years ago

Personally ive never wanked into a pot of soil - rather bizarre if you ask me.
I doubt it was a real penis; looked somewhat pale on the bell end - but it was really a bit too graphic for me! And I have seen a lot; A Serbian movie etc but that really did make me want to dry boak!

Or maybe there is some proof that semen provides that John Innes Number 3 effect.
lol

Grattan catalogue - I see you are being honest maybe tooooo honest!!!!!
dlol

[–] hughwm 9 years ago

I suppose any bodily fluid is going to add at least some nutrients to the soil, but it's not as if he was living in a desert - he had acres of rich looking soil to plant with. It could be that he's going slightly barmy and is getting way too emotionally attached to his vegetable crop.

[–] omendata 9 years ago

Maybe it was an artsy fartsy allusion to carrots!
?;o)

Its uncle Frank Kirsty!
Its time to play!

[–] Thought_Criminal_J62377 9 years ago

I think the scene was included to show just how lonely and desperate he was.

That's a stupid reason since guys do that all the time, even when it's not the end of the world.

I suppose it was necessary to show why he was so willing to invite the two women into his shack.

More stupidity here, most single, heterosexual guys would do that right now today. It doesn't take a post-apocalyptic setting.

It wasn't a necessary scene at all. How did movies get by without showing these scenes 10, 15, 20 years ago? Movie makers just want to push the envelope now.

Tolerance Is Intolerant Of Politically Incorrect Thought...🇺🇸

[–] hugh1971 9 years ago

I think the scene was included to show just how lonely and desperate he was.

That's a stupid reason since guys do that all the time, even when it's not the end of the world.

Certainly all men whack off...what I meant was they don't, as far as I know, whack off to non-erotic pictures of women found in the pockets of men they've just killed. That scene to me suggested the depths of his loneliness.

I agree though the graphic nature of the scene was a bit unnecessary.

'Monsters? We're British!'

[–] Fattycakes 8 years ago

More stupidity here, most single, heterosexual guys would do that right now today. It doesn't take a post-apocalyptic setting.

There was a high risk in doing so as they might well kill him. That is possible today but less likely when all you have is a shack and some root veg for the taking!

[–] omendata 9 years ago

Lol well at least you are honest.

Bearable - you do have a high threshold for boredom!

[–] Doltatron 9 years ago

Having wanked my own weasel a zillion times, I was more seriously concerned (and potentially horrified) of it being a space-aged prosthetic. I mean, I'd rather have a man wank his yard-arm for real than have an entire industry of prosthetic fakery. Unions. Limited hours of filming while wearing that particular indefinite article, “a prosthetic”, not “his prosthetic.”

[–] hughwm 9 years ago

Doltatron, I wasn't sure if it was a prosthetic (I didn't look too closely) but if it was it was probably due to censorship laws about not being able to show an erection or a semi on film.

[–] Little_Tyke 9 years ago

'Course, we don't know that it was his willy. It might have been a stand-in, a porn star, for example, who has no qualms about pulling his pudding in front of the camera. Maybe one of the crew, a bit of a closet exhibitionist, said "I'll do it!"

[–] vlur 9 years ago

To be nominated for BAFTA every god damn European movie has some cock or pussy visible in it.

[–] robertbruced 9 years ago

why waste it in the bedsheets during a wetdream...

[–] Little_Tyke 9 years ago

Men wank. Get over it! Women masturbate as well. Thank goodness we're long past the stage where sex was depicted by a train shooting out of a tunnel at high speed. I saw absolutely nothing wrong with the scene. But he could have rinsed his hands before the five-knuckle shuffle, for personal hygiene's sake.

[–] mel2000 (259) 3 years ago

There's a lot of personal stuff people do that doesn't get regularly depicted on film. Thank goodness.

[–] p_milli_427 9 years ago

I don't think his intention was to want in the pot, I don't really remember but I thought he was trying to piss in the pot and went the other route instead.. could be wrong tho, IMO the entire movie and every thing involved with it, was completely unnecessary!

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] omendata 9 years ago

What was great about it - if you are going to contradict then at least provide your reasons for saying its great - it was utterly depressing , devoid of soul and utterly bereft of any decent directing or a coherent story!

Its uncle Frank Kirsty!
Its time to play!

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] omendata 9 years ago

Well you just proved with your last comment that you cannot hold a conversation and just want to traduce others - what age are you ? 11!
If you had even bothered to check my reviews or profile you would see that I enjoy foreign and low budgeters as well as others and my uncle was the manager of the national film archives where i spent many a day learning about the movies but as your small brain obviously cannot cope with anything further than social media skills we shall leave it there!

Being depressing has nothing to do with logic.
And being well acted or realistic doesnt make it great - your explanations are like a child in kindergarten - you should stay off imdb until you grown up and know a little of what you are talking about!
You give BEN HUR 2/10 lol and National Treasure 9/10 - proves just that!
I revise my previous estimate - you must be 7 years old!

You have no idea what "soul" means so i guess you were poorly educated or google is beyond your grasp!
Turns out you are the ill educated pleb - bit ironic eh.
Oops better go to google and look that word up - might be too much for your small brain - i wonder if your girlfriend knows the ordure you spill on here , thats if you actually have one which i doubt as you dont seem to believe there is such a thing as rape against women - mysoginy is so pre 2000 mate - get a life!

As for being pretentious lol ever heard of irony - nope obviously not you really will have to look it up - your title is the most pretentious I have seen on IMDB -
A social contruct lol Roflmao probably one of the loony libtards that would have us believe islam has nothing to do with rape , murder etc and we should all live in the pink bubble along with all the other limousine libtards.
Well done QED I believe!

Its uncle Frank Kirsty!
Its time to play!

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] chilone (18324) 7 years ago

...and we got to see him wash his arse. Another pointless scene.