The ending is explained BEFORE what most people think


SPOILERS obviously

After all the mishmosh of theories of the ending I watched this for the first time today and realized that everyone is confused about the ending because they interpret his "death" from the SECOND time he shoots himself on stage.



He shoots himself for real when he is standing on the stage in his underwear.

If you watch it from that point on you can see several things.

First there was foreshadowing up to that point. He points out the importance of structure with his discussion with the critic. But as for us as the audience let's take note. The foreshadowing was when Edward Norton's character got angry with him for replacing the real gin with fake gin. Norton's character is an opportunist who is willing to do anything to get the attention he wants. So he replaces the prop gun with a real gun.

Second, backstage he winds up locking himself out because of all the chaos and disorganization. This shows us that the workers are sloppy and not paying attention. Because he comes on stage from the audience, someone rushes out and hands him a gun. So he didn't take the gun with him. Notice there's attention drawn to the fact that he's holding up his hand like a fake gun. Naomi Watt's character even says "put down the gun"

Someone just slaps a gun in his hand (we don't even see who) and he storms to the front of the stage to finish the scene.

Then the camera pulls away.

Notice, there's constant chaos in the Hallways behind the scenes in every other scene before this.

But when he walks onstage from the audience and is just about to shoot himself, the camera pulls away and lingers on the hallway for an extended period of time.

The filmmaker takes a looooong time sitting watching the empty hallway. Why?
Where is everyone? They are all on the stage attending to him because THAT is when he really shot himself.

Listen again, you hear the shot and then you hear applause that suddenly just stops.

Then he walks back into the room and we follow him up with blood on the back of his shirt. When he gets in the room he sits and talks with his daughter. (Why is she there? And notice the gentle conversation and how we hear her voice before we see her. It's a peaceful scene compared to all the drama before it.)

After that he begins many of the over the top abstract things like flying. Notice that it is an interplay of fantasy with reality pushing it's way in. For example when he lands and walks into the theater, the cab driver rushes up and demands to be paid and we see an open taxi door.

IMO All the scenes after the hallway scene reflect (as someone else mentioned) a similar style of "An Occurrence at Owl Creek" he's dying in these scenes and his life is flashing before his eyes as he's imagining it all.

That's why in the scene with his wife, the camera swoops into the dressing room and he's lying across the dressing tables. The room is filled with flowers just as a funeral home would be.

Watch this again and you will see it looks like a funeral and he's in the position he'd be in in a coffin in a flower filled room.

It also mirrors how we are introduced to the hospital room later.

It's a mish mosh of fantasy with reality creeping in as his "rational mind" rewrites it. You can see an almost "going through purgatory" sense of him walking out of the liquor store and seeing the man "performing" in the scaffolding.

When he replays his life, he tells off the critic, he performs the scene he screwed up in a fantastic way, the audience is on their feet and the critic runs out of the theater.

Even if you watch Edward Norton's character in that scene, he is underperforming the scene.

When he wakes up in the hospital room it is just a moment of him regaining consciousness before he dies. Who is in the room with him? The three people whom he loves the most. His best friend, his ex wife and his daughter. (If he was really recovering, wouldn't his girlfriend be there?)

Then at the end when he looks at himself in the mirror he realizes that he's not the same person any more. Notice at this point he's all alone in the room and then Birdman shows up. This is when he dies and goes out the window. At the end he is reassuring himself that his daughter will be OK.

Notice that she first looks down, and notice that prior to this there was a conversation pointing out that it was an accident, not a suicide attempt. This is is reflected by his daughter looking down in fear that he jumped out the window, but then looking up realizing that he just died and flew away.

(Very similar to the end of American Beauty) A sense of peace.

If you go back and watch the movie from the scene with the underwear you will see that from that point on is where it is that he is dying. It doesn't make sense if you do it from the second gun shot.

The scene where the camera "stares down the hallway" is the "break" and lets us know that everything after that is different.


Feedback is welcome. I didn't go through the entire board and I'm curious if anyone else saw it this way.

reply

A good explanation

reply

Damn! You are good at reading
Movies! That is deep!

reply

I too watched it for the first time yesterday. Your explanation makes a lot of sense and I enjoyed reading it. Well done on a top theory.

reply

Thanks for the replies. I completely forgot about this post. Glad people liked it.

reply

good post man, cheers

reply

Nice work, great explaination.

reply

This is a complete misread, IMO. The movie is about a guy who's so desperate to be special that even the good average things in his life are overlooked, to his detriment. So all the other questions of "is he dead" or "is this a dream" are unimportant.

Norton's character is an opportunist who is willing to do anything to get the attention he wants. So he replaces the prop gun with a real gun.


There's nothing that suggests Shiner replaced the prop gun with a real gun. Shiner's a successful arrogant theatre type who likes playing around with people's emotions, but he's certainly not a killer. And there's absolutely zero in the movie to suggest he is.

It's not about anyone killing Riggin. As I mentioned, it's about him not seeing the goodness in life's everyday average normalcy (which also includes some drudgery, compromise, error) and instead feeling everything must be perfect and severely chastising himself when it is not.

reply

There actually is something that foreshadows that Shiner would switch out the gun. Remember when he gets mad at Riggen for using a prop gun with an orange tip that doesn't look real and asks him to change it?

reply

Your theory is correct IMHO, except on one thing: That Norton's character changed the gun in order to kill Riggan. He didn't. There was no real reason for such an action, it would have put an end to his job anyway, as the theater would shut down (plus, it would give more attention to Riggan in the press, something that Norton's character wanted for himself).

It was Riggan himself who went and bought a real gun, after Norton's character asked him to get a "more threatening one". But it seems that because he was out of his dressing room (he got locked out), he didn't have time to take out the real bullets, so the theater helper got the gun from the dressing room as-is (with the real bullets in it). In other words, it was an accident.

But the rest of the theory is sound.

reply

Interesting theory, next time I rewatch I'll view if from your thoughts.

I see how this is a possibility especially with Ralph.

Ralph was in a wheel chair hurt by the falling light, but we see him congratulating Riggans and no injury backstage when Laura was telling Riggans she wasn't pregnant.

I've watched this moving 10 times, even paused it to confirm it was Ralph.


All Hail Zorg

reply

I can see that Norton's character might not have switched the gun because there's no way he would have known Riggan would have been locked out. Maybe just a matter of him bringing a real gun in for "authenticity" or something.

reply

I don't agree. Why continue making a movie if the character dies that early on? What purpose does it serve to continue developing characters, especially majorly from Riggen's perspective if he isn't there and it isn't happening? If it's supposed to be a DMT trip from his brain releasing those chemicals, then that has to be the worst DMT trip ever. It doesn't make sense to me that he killed himself at all until the end. Edward Norton's character has no motive to swap guns and he even states later that Riggen should get a new gun because he can tell it's so obviously fake. If anyone had motive, wouldn't it be his daughter who blows up on him for being egotistical and not being involved in her life? Fresh out of rehab with a grudge, relapses and swaps the gun. I still don't think he died then, but that's some food for thought.

reply

Just watched this last night & I think this might be a bit of a stretch, although I do enjoy your interpretation & you very well could be correct. All of those little details you point out are damn pretty good.

I love the different interpretations you can take from this movie.

reply